rustbucket
Registered User
- Messages
- 829
I have not come across one of these cases but they probably exist and there is a complication.
As I have said in another thread :
So you have to meet all of the qualifying criteria
1) You had Clause 3.2 in your contract
2) You were on a fixed rate which expired after October 2008
3) They did not offer you a tracker rate
AIB claims that they reintroduced the prevailing rate at ECB +3.75% in December 2013 but didn't offer it to people.
So if your fixed rate expired after December 2013, AIB could claim that they had a prevailing rate and could redress you at that rate.
If you had multiple fixed rate periods, this does not apply to you
Let's say you drew down the mortgage in 2008 and fixed for two years until 2010.
Then you fixed for 5 years to 2015.
AIB's failure was in 2010 and you will get the full redress.
Brendan
Brendan does it matter what the nature of the end of the fixed rate was? Did it have to expire naturally as per the term or if you broke out early would the same issue arise?
sorry if worded poorly. From what I understand I am included I am just trying to ascertain the likely timeframe for the capital amount in question (for quick redress calculation) as we had multiple rate changes over term of mortgage.
mortgage fixed in oct 08 for 3 years at 5.2%. At that time the financial sector was beginning to fall apart and rates appeared to be nosediving so we broke out and went on svr at I think 4.5%
will there have been the same onus on AIB to offer tracker if you broke out of agreed fixed rate early?
we had clause 3.2
I requested all info from AIB to go through all rates etc.
is it really just the first fixed rate from oct 08 that is the issue and subsequent rates (fixed, variable or other) are irrelevant?
also does it make any difference if any of these were interest only or had a moratorium built in? (Not in arrears)
thanks and sorry for multiple questions