Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,771
What do we know about it?
Where is it in the bill?
So NAMA buys loans from AIB. It pays €25 billion in ordinary bonds. It pays €5 billion in "subordinated" debt.
This use of the word "subordinated" is confusing me. These bonds will be an asset on the balance sheet of the banks and will not be part of their capital.
They are subordinated from NAMA's point of view, not from the bank's point of view. So is it not really a meaningless word?
These bonds will not be as valuable as the ordinary NAMA bonds.
The ECB presumably won't take them as security for cash.
So the banks will have much bigger write-offs and will require more equity.
The idea is good, but I can't see how it works in practice. Unless the amount is so small, that it is not material.
Brendan
Where is it in the bill?
Risk Sharing
The Bill provides that the banks will share a portion of the risk associated with NAMA by receiving part of the payment for loans in the form of subordinated debt. This will enable NAMA to suspend certain payments to the banks in the event of a loss, and will help to incentivise institutions to work with the NAMA process in the best interests of all of us. The Bill will provide for the level of subordinated debt to be set by ministerial order.
So NAMA buys loans from AIB. It pays €25 billion in ordinary bonds. It pays €5 billion in "subordinated" debt.
This use of the word "subordinated" is confusing me. These bonds will be an asset on the balance sheet of the banks and will not be part of their capital.
They are subordinated from NAMA's point of view, not from the bank's point of view. So is it not really a meaningless word?
These bonds will not be as valuable as the ordinary NAMA bonds.
The ECB presumably won't take them as security for cash.
So the banks will have much bigger write-offs and will require more equity.
The idea is good, but I can't see how it works in practice. Unless the amount is so small, that it is not material.
Brendan