E
Does that mean you would usually advise the beneficiary to have the asset transferred into the beneficiaries name inter vivos ( during the lifetime of the donor); and you would usually advise the donor not to do this and just to leave the asset in their will?The benefit is only theirs [the beneficiaries] when the property is in their name and best ( for them) anyway to have the property transferred inter vivos ( during the lifetime of the donor). I would always advise a donor to hold onto their assets - never know when you're going to need a few bob.
By they do you mean the donor? Do you mean the intervivos thing is better for the beneficiary (not necessarily the donor)?And at least if the donor still has the asset......... Mind you, they can always change their minds which is why the intervivos thing is better.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?