Blackrock1
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,650
thanks, its two different pictures of if include the PPR or not! but i have diverted a large amount of funds to paying down the mortgage.That's correct. It is a rule of thumb from The Millionaire Next Door.
Age x realised pretax annual household income from all sources except inheritances. Divide by 10. This, less any inherited wealth is what your net worth should be.
To be well positioned PAW (prodigious accumulator of wealth), you should be two times the expected level of wealth.
The book doesn't say specifically but I include the net value of your home. I know some people exclude the value of the home when assessing net worth as you need somewhere to live.
At the end of the day, it's a largely meaningless exercise when viewed in isolation. Your spending habits and what you want to do in life also has to be taken into account. You have 4-5 kids that will leave home for 3rd level and you want to help them get them on the property ladder as well as you wanting to retire early, buy a holiday home etc. That's going to cost you a lot of money and the big pot you have may not last as long as you think it will.
I find if people have good saving habits throughout their life, they do alright. Make pension and savings automatic and don't get into too much debt.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
I believe you should include the net worth for that exact reason. But then, people shouldn't be fixated on net worth but on whether they have enough money to maintain the lifestyle that they want. The whole idea of The Number is wrong as you will continue to generate income through profits, rent and pensions throughout life. It doesn't stop when you have X amount.thanks, its two different pictures of if include the PPR or not! but i have diverted a large amount of funds to paying down the mortgage.
thanks for the information StevenIt used to be multiply it by 20. It's changed now and you multiply it by a factor depending on what age you retire. Doesn't really reflect the true value of a DB pension but then, you can only know the true value of it based on the annuity rates in the market at the time of retirement.
View attachment 8350
I think you would need at least €1.2m (30X projected expenses).If at 50 you are debt/mortgage free, kids through 3rd level and you estmated annual spend as a couple is 40k. What woukd be a pension pot amoun that might allow for retirement at that age? Would 800k suffice?
Well, the State pension isn't payable until 66.So would that be approx €360k if you include State Pensions, or should the State Pension not be included in calculations?
(40k- 14k-14k = 12k x 30= 360k)
If at 50 you are debt/mortgage free, kids through 3rd level and you estmated annual spend as a couple is 40k. What woukd be a pension pot amoun that might allow for retirement at that age? Would 800k suffice?
Well, the State pension isn't payable until 66.
I suppose you could say something like €40k x 16 = €640k; plus €12k x 20 = €240, or €880k in total. However, that ignores taxes on drawdowns/benefits.
I would just use a 30X number for simplicity.
Thanks Steven and @Sarenco for yoyr replies.Without running through the figures, I would say that €800,000 in a pension wouldn't be enough for a 50 year old to retire
Have you taken all expenditures into account in that €40k? Replacing cars? How often and how much? Will you give kids any money in the future for property/ weddings? What about the house? Will it need any work over the next 40 years (probably!). There's a lot of additional expenditures.Thanks Steven and @Sarenco for yoyr replies.
If i told you id be entitled to a full UK and Irish state pension (assumption). Woukd that make a big difference? Anyway, either way, I hear ya - hard to predict these things etc.
I don't think there is a universally "right" answer to this question but I have seen it recommended, as a guide, that you "should" have six times your salary saved by age 50 and ten times your salary saved by 65.
But I would take those recommendations with a big pinch of salt.
Me too. I thought I was 'Ok' however now not so sure.......At 47, I have been contributing to pension for the last 20 years (max avc last number of years) and it's still not six times my current salary. Pension plan shows retirement age as 60, and the projection is for it be under 1m. My kids are still primary/secondary school. This thread scares me.
At 47, I have been contributing to pension for the last 20 years (max avc last number of years) and it's still not six times my current salary. Pension plan shows retirement age as 60, and the projection is for it be under 1m. My kids are still primary/secondary school. This thread scares me.
Me too. I thought I was 'Ok' however now not so sure.......
For those of you with anxiety about retirement or even the idea of early retirement should think about the above quoteHe/She who knows that enough is enough will always have enough
Early retirement takes a lot of work. Going at 60 instead of 65 means 5 years less salary, 5 years less pension contributions, 5 years less compounding and probably 5 years more spending (no limits on annual leave). It won't just happen on its own and you have to seriously work at it to be in a position where you are able to stop working earlier than normal. That means spending less and investing more and being intentional about it.I've been playing around on Excel tonight and the only conclusion I've drawn is that early retirement is extremely difficult unless:
At 47, I have been contributing to pension for the last 20 years (max avc last number of years) and it's still not six times my current salary. Pension plan shows retirement age as 60, and the projection is for it be under 1m. My kids are still primary/secondary school. This thread scares me.
Aristotle, if I have a euro for every person who complained that "pensions are crap, the don't make any money", I'd have enough money to bring my wife out for a fancy mealWhat funds have you been invested in over the last 20 years?
Good for you!I'm 57 this year and thirteen years retired on money that other posters think wouldn't be enough
What kind of numbers would you like, there's lots of my posts on here where I've indicated my wealth and my spending habitsBut this is a pseudonymous financial forum and you’re providing no numbers
If you feel comfortable giving € amounts it would be great if you could share.
Yes that is one of the downsides I guess after 13 years of not working I'd say I'm unemployableFor me the big anxiety of giving up work in mid 40s would be unforeseen financial trouble and not being able to earn my way out of it.
Low cost, passive index trackers.What funds have you been invested in over the last 20 years?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?