Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,685
The current minimum capital requirements as per the Capital Requirements Directive are 4% Tier 1 and 8%Total Solvency.
Under PCAR 2010 , The Central Bank set a new target of 8% Core Tier 1 of which 7% must be Equity Core Tier 1.
PCAR 2011 are required to maintain an ongoing capital adequacy of 10.5% Core Tier 1.
Thanks Sunny
So Basle 3 will require the banks to got to 9% by 2013, but the Central Bank are insisting that the Irish banks go to 10.5% immediately?
But the Irish banks have to comply immediately with a capital requirement which will probably be higher than the European banks have to comply with?
Thanks Sunny
So Basle 3 will require the banks to got to 9% by 2013, but the Central Bank are insisting that the Irish banks go to 10.5% immediately?
Would this not mean that if or when this apparent worst case scenario hits, and 10.1% has to be written off, that banks would effectively be back to square one? I just don't see how these provisions are in anyway securing the banking system from this worst case scenario. Maybe I am missing something.
If the stresses happen exactly as predicted the banks will have core tier 1 ratios of 6% plus any amount of the capital conservation buffers held as CT1 at the worst point in the stress - not exactly back to square one
There was no appreciation around Europe that the Central Bank stress tests were more severe than the EU stress tests, he said.
The Irish tests were based over three years and on capital ratios falling to 6 per cent after a stress scenario, compared with two years and a ratio of 5 per cent in the EU.
John Moran of the Department of Finance was reported in today's [broken link removed] as saying
So if the scenarios envisaged in the stress tests happen, the banks will still have 6% Core Tier 1 capital.
As well as that, the Irish stress tests anticipate losses which will crystalise over the next three years whereas the EU test is limited to 2 years.
This is the methodology as I understand it.I think the Irish stress tests are also looking at the tail risk of loans and making provisions for them which is pretty unique.
The calculation method for the capital requirements
The final capital requirements are derived from a series of calculations which, at a high level, have required
the following steps:
The estimation of loan-life and three-year losses under the base and adverse scenarios – the
BlackRock exercise;
The modelling of the impact of these losses on balance sheets and profit and loss accounts; and
The combination of these two steps to produce a capital requirement for each of the four banks.
The relationship between the first and second steps is essential to understanding why the „raw‟ BlackRock
loan loss estimates do not automatically translate into a capital number – in other words, there is not, nor
could there be, a euro for euro translation of BlackRock‟s estimates into capital. This is because:
Losses take no account of existing or future provisions or future bank earnings;
Losses are calculated over both a three-year and a loan-lifetime basis and have not been
discounted back to a present value; and
The model reports losses in the period in which they are realised.
The link between the BlackRock loan loss assessments and the final capital requirement is made through a
calculation of three-year projected losses, inter-changeably referred to as three-year forecast provisions.
Provisions are the liabilities banks hold to meet losses. The translation of provisions into capital is a
complex process, and although there are long established accounting standards to govern this process, it
ultimately turns on judgements about the likelihood and size of losses. In interpreting the BlackRock loan
loss estimates, the Central Bank has been careful to apply such judgements in a conservative manner, and
have drawn on expert accountants to inform and validate these judgements.
The principal driver of these three-year projected loss calculations in the PCAR is the output of BlackRock‟s
work. These three-year projected losses comprise:
Losses from loans that both default and crystallise in 2011-2013;
Losses from loans that default in 2011-2013 but crystallise after 2013.
The BlackRock-derived three-year projected losses in the stress scenario are significantly more
conservative than the banks' own forecast provisions. In part, they are an early recognition of potential
losses and serve to add conservatism to the PCAR capital calculations.
Once revised forecast three-year projected losses have been calculated based on BlackRock loan-lifetime
loss forecasts, these are combined with forecast operating profit or loss and the losses on asset disposals
under deleveraging plans. Once the forecast capital level is calculated, this is compared to Central Bank
capital requirements and the deficit or surplus is derived.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?