S
stevieg
Guest
Hi all!
Friday before last I was running a gig in Dublin and booked a five-star suite in a hotel/guesthouse style building for the act I was bringing over from the UK. When booking i supplied a 3v credit card number to the website but there wasnt enough on the card so I asked a friend could i use their card and give them the money for the room. They said I could and so i rang the guesthouse and called out the details over the phone, to which they charged immediately.
Now, I expected there to be a reception, but as there wasnt, guests were asked to drop their bunch of three keys into a safety box on the way out the door. The act in question forgot to do so when leaving for the airport. I received an email from the hotel owner the following monday (at this stage i had left for a 2 week holiday) saying that my guest had forgotted to leave the keys and there would be a 60euro replacment charge (which could be refunded if the keys were returned) and also a 60euro soilage charge for some drops of red wine on the carpet that needed cleaning. As i was on holidays I forwarded the email to the uk manager of this act asking for the keys to be returned and left it at that. I expect when I return to dublin at the weekend the keys will have been posted back to my office.
Then this morning I get a second email from the same guy saying "Several weeks have now passed since he stayed with us and the keys have not been returned. There is however a security issue here that must be addressed. One key cannot be cut but it is necessary for us to change the locks at this stage. I have tried contacting you by telephone to discuss this issue but cannot contact you on your cell phone. There will now be a lock replacement charge of which we cannot forgo. Our locksmith will be dealing with this immediately. We will be in touch after that."
Several week have not passed, it has only been 10 days! Can they charge me to replace the locks? Also, if they were going to charge me to replace the locks, why would they charge me to replace the key last week, if it wasnt going to usable? Can they charge me to replace a key, and then charge me to replace locks afterwards? If they were going to change the locks if the key wasnt returned, surely they shouldnt charge me to replace a key? One or the other, but surely not both. And should they nbot have mentioned before the email this morning that the threat of changing the locks was there? It was never mentioned before today.
Also, my friend only agreed to the inital payment of 139euro, and I gave the details over the phone. Can they charge all this to her card without her signing a cardholder-not-present form, or agreeing herself over the phone? This is not her bill, and she doesnt give permission for these second and third payments. Are they able to charge her card? It wasnt given to them in writing, nothing was signed and it wasnt on the initial booking.
I dont mind paying the soilage charge, or even the key replacement if the key isnt returned, but this seems like they are just taking advantage charging one after first taking the other?
Any help would be appreciated,
Thanks in advance
Stevie
Friday before last I was running a gig in Dublin and booked a five-star suite in a hotel/guesthouse style building for the act I was bringing over from the UK. When booking i supplied a 3v credit card number to the website but there wasnt enough on the card so I asked a friend could i use their card and give them the money for the room. They said I could and so i rang the guesthouse and called out the details over the phone, to which they charged immediately.
Now, I expected there to be a reception, but as there wasnt, guests were asked to drop their bunch of three keys into a safety box on the way out the door. The act in question forgot to do so when leaving for the airport. I received an email from the hotel owner the following monday (at this stage i had left for a 2 week holiday) saying that my guest had forgotted to leave the keys and there would be a 60euro replacment charge (which could be refunded if the keys were returned) and also a 60euro soilage charge for some drops of red wine on the carpet that needed cleaning. As i was on holidays I forwarded the email to the uk manager of this act asking for the keys to be returned and left it at that. I expect when I return to dublin at the weekend the keys will have been posted back to my office.
Then this morning I get a second email from the same guy saying "Several weeks have now passed since he stayed with us and the keys have not been returned. There is however a security issue here that must be addressed. One key cannot be cut but it is necessary for us to change the locks at this stage. I have tried contacting you by telephone to discuss this issue but cannot contact you on your cell phone. There will now be a lock replacement charge of which we cannot forgo. Our locksmith will be dealing with this immediately. We will be in touch after that."
Several week have not passed, it has only been 10 days! Can they charge me to replace the locks? Also, if they were going to charge me to replace the locks, why would they charge me to replace the key last week, if it wasnt going to usable? Can they charge me to replace a key, and then charge me to replace locks afterwards? If they were going to change the locks if the key wasnt returned, surely they shouldnt charge me to replace a key? One or the other, but surely not both. And should they nbot have mentioned before the email this morning that the threat of changing the locks was there? It was never mentioned before today.
Also, my friend only agreed to the inital payment of 139euro, and I gave the details over the phone. Can they charge all this to her card without her signing a cardholder-not-present form, or agreeing herself over the phone? This is not her bill, and she doesnt give permission for these second and third payments. Are they able to charge her card? It wasnt given to them in writing, nothing was signed and it wasnt on the initial booking.
I dont mind paying the soilage charge, or even the key replacement if the key isnt returned, but this seems like they are just taking advantage charging one after first taking the other?
Any help would be appreciated,
Thanks in advance
Stevie