jasdpace@gmail.
Registered User
- Messages
- 216
I'm not sure everyone would, why pay 60 quid or thereabouts for a letter when you can book directly, Specsavers for example. Fine if you have a medical card I suppose but I wouldn't pay it otherwise.If you were losing your hearing would you not go to a doctor who would refer you to an audiologist?
Hearing aids are specifically included here:
It is pretty poor and probably dates from a time when you couldn't get to see any sort of specialist without a referral letter from doc. Now it's quite easy see several types without the preamble and cost of a doc visit. Assuming it's not mega bucks and it's a common treatment like physio the likelihood of being asked for a copy of the letter from the GP is pretty small I'd say. I'm sure I have put things on my tax form in the past that I have received money back from medical insurance for while not necessarily being referred by doc, dermatologist for example, that is kind of my guideline of should it be included or not! I'm sure had I gone to doc she would have referred me on anyway.It's not just having to pay the GP. Like I've heard that GPs are quite busy! Is this the best use of this very scarce resource?!As written, I have to get the GP's written approval to see a physio to get the relief of physio related expenses!! How else can I show that the physio session was advised/recommended by a Practitioner, as defined? As Guidance Notes go, it's pretty dismal stuff.
They might send an inspector out to have a look at the chair.I suppose nobody gets hearing aids for the craic whereas a chair is harder to be clear about whether it's a medical necessity (not saying it isn't but just pretending to be revenue!) or just a very fancy reclining etc chair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?