Wouldn’t dream of it to be honest , Cavanbhoy. As jpd says jobseekers benefit is for people looking for work.Would OP not be entitled to Social welfare
Payment's of Jobseekers if he wished to claim for himself and spouse.
Thanks wheeler dealer. Anybody got any ideas on any other part time/ working from home maybe or other roles that are readily available to which you refer for people in their late 50s/ early 60s. Don’t have to be “ easy peasy “ as I’m more than prepared to put in the graft and the renumeration doesn’t have to be massive either.Just want to get out of the industry I’m in , I don’t enjoy it anymore as it has changed so much , not for the better.There are plenty of handy part time jobs no commitment .A local teacher who gave up her job teaching because of ill health got a job as a sna in a school ,she says it is so easy but not all sna jobs are like this .At 57 with good health plenty of easy peasy jobs out there for you just to keep finances ticking over to delay dipping into pension
Thanks wheeler dealer. Anybody got any ideas on any other part time/ working from home maybe or other roles that are readily available to which you refer for people in their late 50s/ early 60s. Don’t have to be “ easy peasy “ as I’m more than prepared to put in the graft and the renumeration doesn’t have to be massive either.Just want to get out of the industry I’m in , I don’t enjoy it anymore as it has changed so much , not for the better.
If I remember correctly, you had a mortgage-free home, an education fund put by for the kids and, perhaps most importantly, a spouse with significant public sector pension entitlements.You sound exactly like me.
If I remember correctly, you had a mortgage-free home, an education fund put by for the kids and, perhaps most importantly, a spouse with significant public sector pension entitlements.
I would suggest that your circumstances are quite different from the OP's circumstances.
Thanks wheeler dealer. Anybody got any ideas on any other part time/ working from home maybe or other roles that are readily available to which you refer for people in their late 50s/ early 60s. Don’t have to be “ easy peasy “ as I’m more than prepared to put in the graft and the renumeration doesn’t have to be massive either.Just want to get out of the industry I’m in , I don’t enjoy it anymore as it has changed so much , not for the better.
OMG, what are you saying? That just because one would have a reasonably good occupational pension that they might not honor the contributory old age pension, eventhough one has fully paid up all required contributions?Personally I wouldn’t be relying on the state pension in your planning if I had an ARF with 1.250m …changes are coming and not for the better.
Nobody can say for sure what might happen to the contributory state pension and qualifications criteria for same in the future.OMG, what are you saying? That just because one would have a reasonably good occupational pension that they might not honor the contributory old age pension, eventhough one has fully paid up all required contributions?
Nobody can say for sure what might happen to the contributory state pension and qualifications criteria for same in the future.
What do you mean "excludes the state pension"?My only personal plan excludes the state pension. If I get it, great. If not, I'm covered.
That's over cautious.I don't include it in my retirement planning
How can you say that when nobody has any idea how a hypothetical contributory pension means test might work?I dont include the state pension in my plans either.
I retired early last year, have 32 full years PRSI stamps paid.
If they do means test the contributory, I would get nothing.
I can empathise with this very much.Some of us cant bear another year in the job, due to stress or whatever.
I was more focused on the living expenses side of the equation for last few years.
For every 1K you knock from annual living expenses, thats 25K less you need in pension pot.
I am aware of inflation, and doing a quick check - 3 of the 4 main categories driving inflation, I am not affected.
They won't. It's a myth that seems to live on AAM.If they do means test the contributory, I would get nothing.
Another one? Like the "fact" that a 60:40 equities/bonds investment mix is necessarily a good thing for somebody in their 50s approaching retirement?It's a myth that seems to live on AAM.
Future pensions were touched - they were pushed back in phases to 68 - that might well be rolled back, but that decision meant anyone planning to to retire at 65 and depending on the COAP had to budget for another 40,000 euros. Also I think a weak promise to keep the OAP at 1/3 of average wage stopped being mentioned.They won't. It's a myth that seems to live on AAM.
Tax revenues fell 30% between 2007 and 2010 and there was austerity across the board. Pensions were not touched. If pensions weren't touched in an unprecedented economic collapse then they won't be touched in future.
It has been. The 2011 legislation to increase state pension age in stages to 68 by 2028 has been repealed.that might well be rolled back,
I can control to some extent how much I save and invest, how much I put into a pension fund - but I've no control of what happens to COAP.
Only a capitalised value of €300k-€400k. Maybe if you're Elon Musk it's immaterial but for 99.9% of us it is very much a part of the picture!There's little to be lost by ignoring the COAP from your retirement planning,
You said pensions were not touched - a plan to delay them for 3 years was introduced.It has been. The 2011 legislation to increase state pension age in stages to 68 by 2028 has been repealed.
There will always be much more uncertainty around the future value of your ARF than your state pension. Investment risk is a lot greater than political risk.
Only a capitalised value of €300k-€400k. Maybe if you're Elon Musk it's immaterial but for 99.9% of us it is very much a part of the picture!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?