Yes, and they are employed there too.Hardly! That’s just TV soundbite speak. They have well-educated workforces in their own countries.
Tiny levels of employment and output in comparison to what we have now and those companies, as I pointed out previously, were generally lower tech than the ones we have now. What we had then was very cheap labour relative to the mainland and Britain.It wasn’t our brilliant education system that attracted multinationals here in the 1950s and 1960s such as, inter alia, Liebherr (1958) Leo Laboratories (1959), Warner-Lambert (1960), General Electric (1963) and Pfizer (1969).
Yes, but without the workforce they couldn't come here. We certainly don't have a "world class" education system but it's generally sufficient for our needs.It was and still is incentives offered by the IDA, lack of “red tape” and low corporate taxes.
Yes, again, in a much smaller country with low levels of employment growth.In the 1960s, FDI delivered 70% of new employment and 90% of increased exports in transportable goods.
True.The MNCs came and better education followed.
People should be in the private market. Social housing and welfare in general is a necessary evil. If the economy and society was functioning properly people could afford to buy or rent their own home. The need for social housing is a symptom of a different problem.People often regard the future as the same as today or the same as the past. Social housing doesn’t have to be as it was in the past.
Because of the chronic shortage of social housing people are forced into the private market, where they cannot afford to either buy or rent.
Ever-increasing government subsidies completely distorts the property market.
Yes it does, as long as the State can regulate and enforce standards properly. If it doesn't work that's a reflection of dysfunctionality by the State. An efficient and well run State can ensure the efficient delivery of services. Belgium has the best public healthcare system in Europe. It is publicly funded and largely privately delivered. Whether the State delivers housing directly or by funding private delivery is irrelevant. What matters is the structures and standards they use and their ability to enforce and police those standards.Privatizing what is a social obligation never works.
Out State sector is structurally incompetent. That's at the root of many of our issues, be it healthcare or housing. No amount of money will fix those structural inefficiencies.The housing budget whatever it might be, has to have a purpose. At the moment it is like the proverbial eight-legged camel with little direction and insupportable gaps in both knowledge and accountability.
With such a paucity of basic information, one wonders about the value of Dáil debates and Oireachtas committees. What can they possibly be talking about and how can they possibly arrive at appropriate solutions?