Expelling the population of Gaza is the end goal.It's the total absence of a strategic response that I find striking. There is certainly a tactical military response but there is no response that leads me to think that there is an end goal in mind. When planning it's a good idea to ask the "and then what?" question three times. I don't think the Israelis have asked it once.
I'm not questioning the amount of damage caused by the Israelis firing back at Hamas launch sites. I'm not arguing that Israel hasn't targeted the homes of senior Hamas terrorists. I'm pointing out that to suggest that Israel is carpet bombing Gaza is nonsense.There are thousands of dead Palestinians up to half of them children. https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-war-gaza-health-ministry-health-death-toll-59470820308b31f1faf73c703400b033
Or if you don't trust the AP try the radical Financial Times, some of the pictures are horrific.
Subscribe to the Financial Times
A subscription to the Financial Times provides you with the insights and perspective you need to succeed, now.ig.ft.com
Here is an extract
As of October 17, satellite image analysis shows damage to large areas of south Rimal, including around hospitals, universities and schools. Some entire neighbourhoods have been destroyed.
Residents say such devastation in an area that is home to Gaza’s better-off has a particular symbolic impact, showing that no area is safe. Often known as the heart of the Gaza Strip, it attracted visitors from across the territory and is noted for markets and street food vendors, along with its green space, port and beach.
Expelling them to where? The Egyptians don't want them, any more than the Jordanians want the people from the West Bank.Expelling the population of Gaza is the end goal.
Also intensifying the expulsion of people from the West Bank at the same time, while the world's attention is on Gaza.
Palestinians under attack as Israeli settler violence surges in the West Bank
Palestinian families say they have been intimidated and displaced in the wake of Hamas's attack on Israel.www.bbc.com
I’m not sure about the Irish analogy.I agree with your post but I'm firmly of the opinion that they don't want it. Imagine it's 1985 and the IRA of the was running Northern Ireland after winning an election and murdering the main SDLP and Unionist politicians. Imagine of they had destroyed the economy, enriched themselves, controlled the media and were still committed to the destruction of this State, viewed members of out Police, Parliament, armed forces and judiciary as legitimate targets and were actively trying to kill them. They had also openly stated that they regarded anyone who supported any of those institutions of even the existence of this State as worthy of death. Imagine that they still wanted to take us out of the EU (EEC), were isolationist and ethno-nationalist... In that circumstance would you support them and want them running this country?
What upset you most? It seemed to be a reasonable summary of the facts - if they are indeed facts. Possible bias, for example he makes out buying up land to be akin to genocide. I think much more should have been made of the Six Day War. That was an attempt by the Arab world to eliminate Israel and has contributed to their siege mentality ever since. Though I didn't realise the settlement issue was so serious, the Israelis seem to be to blame there.If anyone is looking for an example of how anti Israeli RTE are this utterly biased history of the conflict is a good example. It's an appalling piece of journalism.
The omission of the fact that Israel was attacked by it's Arab neighbours and that led to the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.What upset you most? It seemed to be a reasonable summary of the facts - if they are indeed facts. Possible bias, for example he makes out buying up land to be akin to genocide. I think much more should have been made of the Six Day War. That was an attempt by the Arab world to eliminate Israel and has contributed to their siege mentality ever since. Though I didn't realise the settlement issue was so serious, the Israelis seem to be to blame there.
I agreed with him as well. but then I usually do.I don't always agree with him, but Michael McDowell has it about right here
Michael McDowell: How far will Rishi Sunak’s government go to deny the slaughter in Gaza?
Those protesting against what some western politicians justify in Gaza are not advocating terrorism; they are demanding that mass killing, terrorising and brutalising stopwww.irishtimes.com
From whom?The omission of the fact that Jordan had illegally annexed the West Bank
It was Mandatory Palestine, an independent Palestinian State created by the UN in May 1948 under the same 1947 Resolutions and at the same time as the Jewish State was established. Jordan Annexed it officially in 1950 after it invaded as part of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. If they, along with Syria and Egypt and the other Arab aggressors, had not attempted to commit another genocide against the Jews (like Hamas want now) then the Palestinians would have their own country now.From whom?
Yes, but the options are diplomacy and a functioning Palestinian State which is not run by a death cult or corrupt old men or the Carthaginian solution; a kill them all and salt the earth type ethnic cleansing.What does a call for a ceasefire really mean? For many it is just stop the killing, fair enough. But for our leaders it seems to be a sort of "you have already got more than enough revenge", we even have Leo acting like a father confessor saying the latest attacks look like revenge. This is seriously missing the point. I am sure there is an element of revenge as in any war. But this time a statement that "if Hamas attack us we will exact (more than enough) revenge", which has been the approach ever since Hamas took control of Gaza, is exactly what Hamas wants. That approach was meant as a deterrent but has seriously misfired. The suicide mentality of Hamas as with ISIS is not impressed by retaliation/revenge.
Hamas have now stated that the October 7th barbarity is the new strategy and will be repeated. (Dis)proportionate retaliation or revenge is now totally inadequate to the situation. The Hamas threat needs to be totally eliminated.
The tunnels could be filled with seawater....The Hamas threat needs to be totally eliminated.
Where's Moses when you need him...The tunnels could be filled with seawater....
Hamas has been a useful tool for Israel, allowing it to divide Palestinians. Hamas acted as a counter to the Palestinian Authority.What does a call for a ceasefire really mean? For many it is just stop the killing, fair enough. But for our leaders it seems to be a sort of "you have already got more than enough revenge", we even have Leo acting like a father confessor saying the latest attacks look like revenge. This is seriously missing the point. I am sure there is an element of revenge as in any war. But this time a statement that "if Hamas attack us we will exact (more than enough) revenge", which has been the approach ever since Hamas took control of Gaza, is exactly what Hamas wants. That approach was meant as a deterrent but has seriously misfired. The suicide mentality of Hamas as with ISIS is not impressed by retaliation/revenge.
Hamas have now stated that the October 7th barbarity is the new strategy and will be repeated. (Dis)proportionate retaliation or revenge is now totally inadequate to the situation. The Hamas threat needs to be totally eliminated.
Sure and the October 7th attacks all part of the cunning Zionist plan.Hamas has been a useful tool for Israel,
No I don't think so. I think the monster Israel fed has bitten back.Sure and the October 7th attacks all part of the cunning Zionist plan.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?