Habitual Residence

Q

quarterfloun

Registered User
Messages
117
If you are from the UK, living in Ireland, in a house, your three children go to an Irish National School why is this not considered appropriate to qualify you for habitual residence?

They are not claiming child benefit in any other country so surely evidence such as a letter from the school principal or a check with the DoE should suffice. This money is the difference between living and going hungry.

They are living in accommodation that they pay €1 rent for (long story but the house they live in is 1/4 of a development site twinned with my property) but they don't want it vandalized so everyone is a winner.

The developer is not registered as a landlord - he has never even collected the "rent" so they can't provide that.

Anybody got any ideas?
 
The main condiiton for HRC is living here for previous 2 years and periods in UK are taken into consideration. Nothing to do with proving kids are at school here or that they are paying rent here. What is the exact story on their length of residency and their past history in this regard?
 
Welfarite, where did you get that information that "The main condition for HRC is living here for previous 2 years"? The official website of the Dept of social and family affairs says:

Irish and European law set down the following five factors to be considered when deciding if you are habitually resident:
  • Your main centre of interest, based on facts such as:
    • whether you own or lease a home here,
    • where your close family members live,
    • whether you belong to social or professional associations here, and
    • any other evidence or activities indicating a settled residence in Ireland
  • The length and continuity of your residence in Ireland or other parts of the Common Travel Area
  • The length of and reason for any absence from Ireland. For example, you can spend time on short holidays, studying or travelling outside of the Common Travel Area and still be regarded as habitually resident here
  • The nature and pattern of your employment, if any
  • Your future intention to live in the Republic of Ireland as it appears from the evidence
We will consider the five factors equally when making a decision. The evidence we use for each factor depends on the facts of your case.

There is nothing about 2 years. In fact, we are in a situation now where we are trying to to prove that we are "habitually resident" here, we are living in Ireland for the last 6 years, bought a house here 4 years ago, our daughter was born here and has an irish passport and yet the community welfare officer told us we might have problems with the HRC. So I honestly don't know HOW they decide, I think it depends on the mood of the deciding officer and actually I have a suspicion that the reason they have no definite conditions for one to pass the habitual residency test is to be able to get rid of non-nationals. Sad.
 
Welfarite said:
The main condiiton for HRC is living here for previous 2 years and periods in UK are taken into consideration. Nothing to do with proving kids are at school here or that they are paying rent here. What is the exact story on their length of residency and their past history in this regard?
Click to expand...

Been here 8 months, never been back to England since they got here. It has to be some form of State sponsored vindictiveness - I can't see why else they would be subjected to this. They live here, cut all their ties with the UK etc. etc. so "proving" that you live here should be straightforward. Bank Statements, bills, the school roll are not "Proof"

I bet the revenue will treat them as habitually resident when it suits them.
 
Section 246 of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 provides that:
"it shall be presumed, until the contrary is shown, that a person is not habitually resident in the State at the date of the making of the application concerned unless he has been present in the State or any other part of the Common Travel Area for a continuous period of 2 years ending on that date."
Section 30 of the Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2007 added the following to the above:
"(4) Notwithstanding the presumption in subsection (1), a deciding officer or the Executive, when determining whether a person is habitually resident in the State, shall take into consideration all the circumstances of the case including, in particular, the following:
  1. the length and continuity of residence in the State or in any other particular country;
  2. the length and purpose of any absence from the State;
  3. the nature and pattern of the person's employment;
  4. the person's main centre of interest, and
 
quarterfloun said:
Been here 8 months, never been back to England since they got here. It has to be some form of State sponsored vindictiveness - I can't see why else they would be subjected to this. They live here, cut all their ties with the UK etc. etc. so "proving" that you live here should be straightforward. Bank Statements, bills, the school roll are not "Proof"

I bet the revenue will treat them as habitually resident when it suits them.
Click to expand...

But why are they subject to HRC if they have continually lived in teh commom travel area. Would it be a case of moving from NI which complicates thigns; they might be considered 'welfare tourists'.
 
I don't understand where the Habitual Residence issue is coming from.

Have you been turned down for Child Benefit on Habitual Residence grounds of what exactly is the problem. Perhaps I am mis-understanding something here.

There is no Habitual Residence condition applying to former UK residents living in Ireland
 
Are both parents now living in ROI? Has either parent previously claimed Child Benefit from HM Revenue & Customs in respect of these or other children?
 
The "2 year rule" should not be considered the sole or main factor in determining HRC - it is one of the 5 factors to be considered equally.

There was a practice of just looking at the "2 year rule" to determine HRC, however it was found that persons who lived in the UK for 2 years (regardless of nationality) were getting around the HRC qualification on the basis of their residence in the UK.

From the guidelines for Deciding officers on HRC -
The presumption in Section 246 (1) does not mean that an applicant is automatically considered to be habitually resident in the State because he or she has been here (or in another part of the Common Travel Area) for 2 years or more.

Also subsection (1) does not mean that an applicant can be automatically considered to be "not habitually resident" because he or she has not resided here for 2 years.
 
I am interested to hear if you are still having problems or if anyone else is.
 
If I want British citizenship I would need to live in the UK for 5 years. You're sort of bound by the laws of the country you visit.. it's nothing got to do with state vindictiveness.
 
tenchi-fan said:
If I want British citizenship I would need to live in the UK for 5 years. You're sort of bound by the laws of the country you visit.. it's nothing got to do with state vindictiveness.
Click to expand...

Fair enough....but if you live here you live here and therefore are habitually resident. If the terminology were correct and the phrase "need to live here for five years to qualify" was used instead of "habitually redsident" then no problem.

When I emigrated to the UK in 1985 I was not treated like this. I filled a form in and a week later I was getting just enough to live on which is what this is all about - basic sustinence.
 
Welfarite said:
Section 246 of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 provides that:
"it shall be presumed, until the contrary is shown, that a person is not habitually resident in the State at the date of the making of the application concerned unless he has been present in the State or any other part of the Common Travel Area for a continuous period of 2 years ending on that date."
Click to expand...

As far as I know the UK is CTA........as they lived all their lives there I think they fit the 2yr requirement.
 
quarterfloun said:
If you are from the UK, living in Ireland, in a house, your three children go to an Irish National School why is this not considered appropriate to qualify you for habitual residence?
Click to expand...

quarterfloun said:
As far as I know the UK is CTA........as they lived all their lives there I think they fit the 2yr requirement.
Click to expand...

I'm confused now. If they are from CTA why was HRC raised by you in original post? HRC (and 2 year condition) does not arise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top