Thanks for the info, Vanilla.
I wonder is this the challenge Sweetpea referred to?:
“… the High Court has recently dealt with a constitutional challenge to the existing legislative provisions on ground rents (Shirley v A. O'Gorman & Co Ltd [2006] IEHC 27, High Court, 31 January 2006) and that the unsuccessful plaintiff in that case has appealed to the Supreme Court which, at the time of writing (November 2007), has yet to hear that appeal.”
([broken link removed])
Wikipedia says:
“Case names are usually given with the plaintiff first, as in Plaintiff v. Defendant.”
So in this case I suppose “Shirley” was unsuccessful and has appealed.
Further googles reveal:
“Shirley v. O'Gorman & Company Limited, Ireland and The Attorney General (High Court, 31 January 2006, Peart J.). The High Court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the statutory scheme for the enlargement of tenants' interests to acquire the fee simple interest in business premises offended against Article 40.3 and Article 43 of the Constitution.”
(
http://www.attorneygeneral.ie/pub/Annual_Report_2006.doc)
So this case seems to refer to business premises. I wonder will the outcome affect residential property situations?