Farmers might be happy to supply their land for shantytowns. The profit might be higher than with the usual payments from Brussels.
The evidence makes it clear that was a free-for all, so I wouldn't expect this one to be either.This is the same Roderick who a few years ago granted planning exemptions to anyone creating IPAS accommodation with no regard at all to the neighbours or locality in general!
Can't be making sensible suggestions like that now. People might get ideas.Councils could sell plot owners the drawings for permitted designs. People don’t need to hire architects or get planning permission, they just choose their pre-approved preferred design. Councils get income from the rtg plot, the plans, inspections, certification.
But on a wider scale, how will systems cope? Water pressure, sewage, national grid?
If they allowed a free-for-all as some are hoping, the system would collapse, as would water supply as many of our urban areas are already at capacity. Thankfully I expect this to be far from a free-for-all.How would sewage work?
People are constrained in what they can do today, their neighbours have certain rights and entitlements that can't be trampled by the selfish actions of a one individual. Let's not pretend that this proposal will distinguish those rights entirely.By your logic, your neighbours couldn't extend their houses, have larger families , take in lodgers, get a dog, let their children play in their back garden, or socialise in their own home because they might disturb your peace and quiet in your back yard.
That's exactly the kind of thinking that has us in this mess!! Don't worry about services, sure just throw up shacks anywhere you have a corner and them moan once the system is overwhelmed for all.And it's a totally separate issue from any kind of housing development, including someone building a residential cabin in their back garden.
That is clearly false in this context as evidenced by many LA enforcement proceedings. Show me some examples of where someone built an un-authorised house in an urban area where the authorities didn't take action?One selfish individual can absolutely trample on their neighbour's rights & entitlements, because unless you have pockets deep enough to go to court nobody is going to do anything for you.
True in some cases, but the people spoke and most refused to pay charges. Deciding to put those under-funded services under increased pressure isn't a solution.It's obvious that provision of all kinds of services has been neglected for decades.
Perhaps you should read some of the development plans and learn how those factors are considered.At best government (national & local) plan to satisfy the needs of the population as it is now in 5 or 10 years time.
That's just it, they need homes, not sub 40sqm sheds cramped into small gardens. We have housing challenges, not quite an emergency, we should look resolve the issues there and not create. Covering the precious little green space with sub-standard cramped accommodation is just going to create more problems.GPs need homes too. As do the engineers & construction workers to build water & the sewage systems,
Actually, it wouldn't. It's already a struggle to get trades, where are all the builders going to come from?Actually, 1 in10 would be around 200,000 studio apartments in short order which would be absolutely amazing.
I know the one, it's not in an urban garden so does not satisfy the criteria specified. It's also not an example of where the authorities didn't take enforcement proceedings as it was only those proceedings brought the case to the public eye. They've spent a lot of money fighting that and are not home free (if you'll excuse the pun) yet.There's a 588 square metre mansion in Meath which the council have been trying unsuccessfully to get knocked for the last 20 years or so, including at least one trip to the Supreme Court.
Precisely my point, it won't, and shouldn't be a free-for-all. In the right context and at the right scale there's a good case for these.And I don't think anyone is suggesting that a flatpack from B&Q would be acceptable accommodation, and it sounds like the requirements for open space would remain as they are for extensions & sheds at (I think) 25 square metres.
Cost is a good reason, most the the UK / European modular manufacturers won't ship here for that reason.On the availability of trades, the logical mitigation is to order from overseas. No reason a timber-frame structure should be made on this island (or even this continent) as long as the standards are met. That applies to any new house, most of which are timber-frame anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?