I certainly have not misrepresented what you said. Your opinion of what people assuming prices will go up being a pessimists view is hillarious. What is good for society is of no importance when talking about this what is happening or may happen. Things change neither good nor bad just different. If you assume people must buy houses and accept they can't then you are the pessimist. The first problem is people don't have to own property our culture is changing this could be part of it. I would also like to point out that many young people stayed at home when they couldn't buy when unemployment was high. THe same is still the case just for different reasons. A fall in marriage rates maybe seen as bad for society but others would say at least we don't have people trapped in marriage.walk2dewater said:I really havent a clue what you're saying, but I generally get the impression you either havent read my posts or are misinterpreting them.
My last post made the point that people promoting higher property prices are actually the ones promoting 'doom and gloom'. Higher prices from here forward is in fact the PESSIMIST view in my opinion, it is truly a gloomy outcome if prices become x15, x20 average salaries. The ability to buy a cheap, well-built place of your own is a good thing for society, surely, is it not?
A positive view from sombody hoping to get into the Irish marketgearoid said:Cue sane property prices hopefully.
Gearoid
"A tendency to stress the negative or unfavorable or to take the gloomiest possible view:"walk2dewater said:If I though Irish property was good value, I'd be all over it. Facts as I SEE THEM, is that its ripe for a nasty fall.
That is nice but this is not symantics this is your view that people are doing this with intent and begrudgery as you said.. THis is not casue and effect of warning about smoking may kill you but an assumption why people want prices to go up or down. You are assuming the worst in people that is not a positive view and as you can't know what people are thinking you are assuming the worst. THis is a pessimist view. Not a point of debate. Everyone else here has talked about people hoping their house go up in value with eternal optomisim. You are simply wrong to say people hoping prices go up are pessimists becasue you can't know their intent and ignore a crash is a negative thing. You can argue their view has negative effects but you don't know intent and assume the worst.walk2dewater said:And I stand by my assertion that further price increases in Irish property represents a gloomy, doomy world for the younger generation. What a horrible outcome if todays youngsters have to get into debt x15, x20 their incomes just to own a roof over their head.
gearoid said:Loki,
Sorry about this, but sane property prices for me would mean a 20-30% fall!
Why should anyone pay 300k for a poorly built 2-bed apartment far from anywhere where they have to pay a 1000 euro plus a year maintenance charge?
I think the current boom is a disaster for this economy in the future.
I don't want to get into what seems to be to be a bit of a spat but I do tend to the walk2dewater's point of view more than yours.
Gearoid
Loki said:If prices crash this is a bad thing nobody thinks this will be good.
Loki said:I know but you are positively hoping you can afford and not negatively hoping that people will be ruined so you can buy. Or did I get you wrong?
The actual problem with the market is not the point just the assumption of intent.
Somebody hoping for something they think is positive is not a pessimits' view even if their wish is bad for others.
It is a bad thing for the country nobody thinks otherwise. The extent of the damage is only what people would debate. If a person thinks what the want is positive then they aren't pessimists that simple. They have to think it is a bad thing.extopia said:You are forgetting about the people who can't afford to buy houses TODAY. A fall in prices would be welcomed by them.
extopia said:You are forgetting about the people who can't afford to buy houses TODAY. A fall in prices would be welcomed by them.
Loki said:It is a bad thing for the country nobody thinks otherwise. The extent of the damage is only what people would debate. If a person thinks what the want is positive then they aren't pessimists that simple. They have to think it is a bad thing.
I forgot nothing I just didn't think you were going to say something so ... (actually I can't say something polite as you appear to be a troll at this point)
Think what you like but you are either a troll or just unable to understand a standard English word. I really can't be bothered explaining it anymore and can not stay polite to somebody claim such a ridiculous use of a word and simply incorrect.
Loki said:It is a bad thing for the country nobody thinks otherwise. The extent of the damage is only what people would debate. If a person thinks what the want is positive then they aren't pessimists that simple. They have to think it is a bad thing.
Let me be 100% clear a crash is a bad thing no matter what. You have a differernt view of that fine. I am not talking about a price correction but crash.beattie said:I too don't view it as a bad thing if there was a correction in prices, true the economy would suffer and many would be left in negative equity but is it better for people to take on unrealistic loans at record low interest rates when there will be trouble once rates go up again.
roryodonnell said:What is the difference between a downward daily "correction" and a crash?
Loki said:If a person thinks what the want is positive then they aren't pessimists that simple.
Loki said:(actually I can't say something polite as you appear to be a troll at this point)
Think what you like but you are either a troll or just unable to understand a standard English word. I really can't be bothered explaining it anymore and can not stay polite to somebody claim such a ridiculous use of a word and simply incorrect.
walk2dewater said:Call it whatever you like. I have outlined the "event" that is pending in earlier posts so won't describe the reasons or mechanism here. In my opinion, the "event" will be minimum 3 years long, likely much longer. It will involve periods of price drops, base forming, then massive gaps down; typical behaviour in bear markets. The tail end will record slower price falls than the beginning.
Some properties will find buyers only with massive discounts and will sit on the market for months and month on end, others will fair better. In terms of the general market, I think 50% fall overall is a reasonable minimum. That would only get us back to 2002 prices, which remember were double those of 1997.
By the bitter end, "property investment" will be a sour phrase with loaded connotations, and will be wildly out of favour.
roryodonnell said:I agree completely. As one poster said before, I can't wait to hear all the complaints on Joe Duffy, giving out about the fact that they weren't told property prices would drop, that the government should do something about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?