adj38 said:Yes I do represent leaseback developers, but only because i believe in the concept.
If you invest in property it is always speculative in so far as you do not know what prices will do. So are stocks, gold, antiques - take your pick.Askar said:Forgot to add:
You said previously "If you are looking for speculative gains you should look elsewhere" yet now you are saying that this is a speculative play. You are contradicting yourself. This is in fact a purely speculative play with no return based on rental yield, since you are contributing annually in addition to the large 30% upfront equity payment. I cannot find any rational basis for your alleged 'belief' in these schemes, other than the fact that you are getting commission on each sale you make.
Albatross said:I wanted to maximise the mortgage because for tax purposes you can offset interest (maximised) against income, I am told. It is a French mortgage through HSBC.
bacchus said:True for the tax that you will have to pay in France, but not sure if the Irish revenue will allow you to offset the interest (as French mortgage) against your Irish Tax liability, therefore interest will not be offset at all.
If you invest in property it is always speculative in so far as you do not know what prices will do. So are stocks, gold, antiques - take your pick.
The annual contributions are not interest only but repayment based so after 20 years or so the capital is repayed. Try any mortgage calculator for your own figures.
Clearly you are intent on misquoting me.Askar said:Fine. So you now agree it's speculative (contrary to your previous e-mail) and there are no returns on the yield even with a 30% deposit. YOu are absolutely right to say that people should make up their own mind, rather than rely upon what is being said by those who have 'belief' in these schemes, and earn commission from selling these properties. I am just surprised that, as an agent, you could not even make a case for a return on the guaranteed yields with a 30% equity deposit.
Your distracting points about how long these schemes have been in existence is of practically no relevance whatsoever, nor indeed is the cash on deposit comment. The question is are there better returns in property elsewhere. And that is what individuals should make up their own mind about!
asdfg said:Less Allowable expenses which includes Interest on Mortgage only
from extract
and the same deductions and allowances are available as if the income had been received in the State
Which notes that 'a series of concerns have been raised by consumers on Askaboutmoney.com'.Qawra said:There is an article i today's Independent for anyone who is interested.
Keentoinvest said:Has anyone here tried to claim their vat back from the french leaseback? Id be interested to know how long it took
bacchus said:- 20% over-priced (easy to understand why- you get 19.6% after 15 years onwership)
- over supplied
- advertised return based on unrealistist rental prices.
- high unoccupancy rate due to high rent.
- while the tax insentive associated to these leasebacks "could" make sense for French resident, it does not for none French resident as you will ultimately end up paying 42% tax (assumption you are on 42% tax band) no matter how good the French tax benefits are.
Why do you think they are so much advertised in Ireland? b'cos they can not sell them to the French themselves!!
Stay clear....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?