I'm in DubNE and can see little prospect of Tommy Broughan bringing in a second candidate (in a 3-seater). Killian Forde could do well, but the SF history can be used against him. Also, his power base is Donaghmede, which overlaps with Broughan.
Will Broughan even get elected? DNE was a very close race last time with 5 candidates with similar 1st preferences seeking only 3 seats.
You might like to revisit my query on this claim again - see http://www.askaboutmoney.com/showpost.php?p=1051941&postcount=64True. Maybe he only made it last time based on his promise to, if in Government, deliver the LUAS and a third-level institution to the constituency. I kid you not !
You might like to revisit my query on this claim again - see http://www.askaboutmoney.com/showpost.php?p=1051941&postcount=64
Is this one of those things that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it?
The reason why I suspect this is untrue is because;I repeat it because I believe it to be true based on my own recollection of a piece of campaign material that lingered in my hand for a short time in between it's journey from my letter box to the green bin.
If obtaining a scanned image of same document is the provenance you require to back up this recollection, and I am unable to produce same, then I must have made it up to throw mud at Deputy Broughan, as part of some nefarious FF/FG/SF/MRLP campaign ? Yeah ? That makes sense? Cos in the Come On Down Super Giveaway Campaign of 2007, it is implausible that the Labour Party would have made such extravagant campaign promises ?
That site you linked to contains one piece of campaign documentation from 2007. So, that means he only ever printed one item ?
How many times does Gilmore have to unequivocally rule this out before people will listen?
Listen to his interview from Weds this week, about 7:40 into the interview;I have heard him rule it out but I have not heard if he specifically said he would rule it out even if Labour were the senior party. Maybe it would make no difference but I imagine there would be some temptation to be the senior partner in governement for the first time.
..when Labour comes out as the largest party?
I wouldn't claim to have a national view, but they will certainly gain one, possibly two, and if the wind is behind them, maybe three in Dublin South. Eamonn Ryan is a gonner, the Seamus Brennan/George Lee seat is a gonner, and Kitt is at risk.Would you care to identify the constituencies you believe where LAB will gain seats ? And, at whose expense ?
I wouldn't claim to have a national view, but they will certainly gain one, possibly two, and if the wind is behind them, maybe three in Dublin South. Eamonn Ryan is a gonner, the Seamus Brennan/George Lee seat is a gonner, and Kitt is at risk.
See http://politicalreform.ie/2010/09/2...it-might-mean-in-constituency-terms/#more-997 for one analysis, based on the TV3 poll.That's the piece I need explained to me - how can they gain sufficient seats to be the largest party in the next Dail? And where will those seats be gained ?
Right so, he's led the party from 12% to 45%, so we should DEFINITELY start questioning his leadership ?????And if Gilmore can't make that breakthrough, his position as party leader must be called into question.
See http://politicalreform.ie/2010/09/2...it-might-mean-in-constituency-terms/#more-997 for one analysis, based on the TV3 poll.
It's a good starting point for an analysis, but seeing labour on 57 seats (and I'll hold my hand up if proven wrong) indicates that we need a deeper analysis.
For me the starting point would be to go through the first preferences of each party in each constutuency from the last election.
You'd then need to apply a likely constituency specific swing.
You then need a rule of thumb on transfers.
I've done a detailed analysis (out of statistical interest) on Carlow/Kilkenny before.
In 2007 labour and FG won almost 40% of the vote and won one seat. FF and the greens won 55% and that gained them 4 seats!
If that's not crazy enough, in 2002 the constituency had only 4 seats on offer (due to having the sitting Ceann Comhairle) and FF took 3 of those 4 seats with 50% of the vote.
This is an extreme situation, but it does highlight a few things:
So looking at that Millward-Browne analysis in respect of Carlow-KK,
- The parochial nature of politics (the FF canndidates were spread perfectly geographically whilst transfers not alone did not occur between FG and Labour, they didn't transfer very well internally between FG or Labour candidates in different parts of the constituency)
- The profile of the candidates (maybe 35% of people want to vote for labour but 50% of these have never voted labour before, when they are presented with an unknown candidate they are less likely to vote for them)
- Vote management (In a 4 seater the maximum vote that will be counted is 80%, but could be as low as 70% due to lost transfers. FF know they will get their own vote and nothing else. If they have two equally matched candidates, they only need 30% of the vote to get two seats. They have form at getting this right. Labour do not have that kind of vote management experience).
1) I find it dubious that FF % falls from 45 to 26 whilst labout goes from 13% to 35% even based on the swing since last election
2) Even if FF were to fall to 26% they'd probably pick up 2 seats due to vote management and candidate profile
My overall prediction for what it's worth is:
FG: 60
FF: 50
Lab: 40
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?