Fiath Haz-Budapest

jwf

Registered User
Messages
25
Hi
Does anyone have experience with the Fiath Haz development in Buda?
Prices seem v high though the build quality looks pretty good.
JohnF
 
Re: fiath haz

What price per square metre were you quoted for this development? District I tends to carry a premium - almost identical prices to District V. The average price has fallen in District I in recent years.
 
Re: fiath haz

Hi Budapest
Almost 2500Eur.!
What is the range for District 1 at the minute?
JohnF
 
Re: fiath haz

Hello John,

District 1 is the downtown of Buda where prices are over €2,400 a sqm if we talk about a new build apartment (which is a normal apartment). In this district prices can be over €4,000 if the apartment has a nice view.

I went through the technical description of the project. I would like to draw your attantion to the following pitfalls:

- kitchen issue: discuss it with developer becasue low stadard kitchen is just waist of money

- sanitery, hard wood, tiles : choose them by yourself with extra price becasue basic things will not have any added value in resale price

- parking issue: car park is strongly recommended because it is almost impossible to find a car space off street

I will look at site soon and get back to you with my impressions. However, district 1 is very popular between Hungarians which has a message to you.
 
Re: fiath haz

Hi Budapest
Almost 2500Eur.!
What is the range for District 1 at the minute?
JohnF

According to reports I've read, the average price in 2006 was €1,436/sqm for second hand apartments - exactly the same as for District V, but new builds are always much more expensive. This figure also hides huge variations within the district and this part of it tends to be significantly cheaper than the castle area, where €4,000/sqm is entirely possible as Hungary mentioned. There may be a rarity value for Fiath Haz as there are very few new builds in this district at the minute. Rental prospects are probably quite good for corporate tenants, but parking is essential in a project like this. Even though District I is easily accessible by public transport and central, it doesn't appeal to foreign individual renters (foreign students and younger professionals) in the same way as District V/central VI. There is a bit of a mental block about going across the bridge! However, a similar-spec new build (if it were even possible) in District V would be much more expensive that this. It's important to note too that this is not the best part of District I and not far from quite dodgy areas. Secondly, to get an 8% return on a project like this, you'd need to rent e.g. a 1 bed 50sqm apartment for €833/month!
 
Re: fiath haz

District 1 is an expensive district. Selling and Renting prices are high therefore rent is reasonable. This part of the city is occupied and owned by Hungarians and very popular are for both young and old people.

District 5 and 6 was always common areas in Budapest while district 1 is still a prestige part of Budapest.

The most expensive parts of City(avarage price): district 1, 2 and 12 (Buda districts)

If somebody invest in Buda, different business view needs to be delivered, otherwise, it can be risky!
 
Re: fiath haz

Thanks Guys
I value both your perspectives on this forum and I'm sorry that I didn't have time to look either of you up when I was there last week. (Too busy getting pummelled in the NY Boscolo - which was remarkably cheap and first class!)

Will decide on Fiath within the next few days.
Thanks
JohnF
 
Even after including some incredibly high prices for property in the castle district (€2,200/square metre average in the 1014 post code), the overall average price in District I is exactly the same as District V in 2006. According to these statistics (compiled by Huninfor Kft.), the most expensive second hand property sold in any part of the downtown was in the Southern part of District V (most likely with a panoramic view of the Danube). Between the end of the property bubble here (c. 2004) and 2006, the average price fell by 4.9% in District I, while prices remained unchanged during this time frame in District V.

Districts II and XII have the highest average prices per district in Budapest, but the rental market in these areas is very different and much more complicated than the small to medium sized apartment rental market in Downtown Budapest.

The typical Hungarian perspective would suggest that District I is the most prestigious part of the city centre (along with specific parts of central Pest and patches of District II). However, foreign investors and also foreign tenants much prefer to locate themselves in the better parts of District V/central VI. In their/our eyes, this is the most prestigious part of the city centre. The real cultural, financial, architectural, retail and social centre of the city is here. In my opinion, as the Budapest downtown rental market is mainly foreigners, there are still good reasons to purchase in these areas. In addition to this, the younger wealthy Hungarians I know tend to equate this part of the city with District I, whereas the older, more established view is that the Buda side is best. It's important to be aware of both the conflicting established and newer perspectives on this.
 
If necessary I repeat myself again:

- district 1 is owned and occupied by wealthy Hungarians
- this is not popular among foreign invesstors
- targeting new owners and tenants are also wealthy Hungarians
- extra note: more and more solicitor relocates from district 5 to district 1

The other main issue in Budapest related to good and bad area:

- gipsies live in district 5 and district 6
- district 1 is not occupied by gipsies

Renting market in Buda side is very strong especially for 1 bed apartments. It is very silly thing to say that there is no better place to live in Budapest just district 5 on Pest side. The truth is people like to live everywhere if they want to live there or there is no other option to choose a better place to live (financial position). Castle area is a very popular district to live because it is a real and old residential area.

Finally, big companies are also located at Buda side. I mean people want to live in Buda if they work in Buda.

Against you, I still think letting small and medium apartments in downtown of Pest are not a piece of cake because it is oversupplied.

I say talking about things right and do things right are not the same.

budapest, you believe in district 5 and 6 (prime location) while the reality is that Buda property market is a more prestige part of Budapest especially among Hungarians. You are talking about your friends etc. who prefer downtown. I am a Hungarian and my friends do not want to live in downtown because of dusty, air, parking problems, noise, neighbours, gipsy issue, traffic etc. (typical problems of downtown in Budapest). Further, investors view and Hungarians view are not the same this is the reason why downtown became overpriced.

Four quesitons:

- Who will purchase the apartment from you?
- How do you want to sell it if selling market is expected to be oversupplied? (foreign ownership in district 5 and 6 is very high!)

- Are you sure that investor will invest in downtown again and again in the next 10 years?

- Do you think reach Hungarians are stupid because they are live in district 1,2 and 12 instead of district 5 and 6?

There is an important consequence you need to understand:

- All of important people live in Buda

I strongly believe that new city centre will be much bigger than district 5 in the future. Plus invest into an area where Hungarians are more interested than Investors could give you a better position in terms of resale. And if you are investor resale position is essential.

As I said, what you are talking about downtown is the same I heard five years ago. Déjavu, Déjavu, Déjavu....
 
- gipsies live in district 5 and district 6
- district 1 is not occupied by gipsies

I am a Hungarian and my friends do not want to live in downtown because of dusty, air, parking problems, noise, neighbours, gipsy issue

I don't know where to start to reply to this. I know that my Hungarian friends, who are involved in Roma issue awareness in Bp would have a thing or two to say though. Can you please amend this part of your post as it's very offensive.

In relation to the property investment issue, which is what we're really discussing, I believe your arguments are a perspective and not a fact, as of course are mine. If you'd read my previous posts properly, you'd have realised that I understand that certain locals tend to prefer to live in Buda. I understand this perspective totally and don't disagree with it. However, I also know that the downtowns of central European cities are in all likelihood going to have a lower percentage of local owners if current trends continue. Traffic issues, more expensive shops, a busier atmosphere are not the key issues for anyone who wants to live in any city centre. By buying the right type of properties now in the downtown area, it's possible to generate a 6-8% income without too much hassle, as foreign tenants prefer to live here. I have direct experience of this. It's not rocket science. It's just about finding the right properties, which is a lot easier now with less competition from other foreign investors. One example I can give is of a friend of mine who purchased a beautifully-renovated apartment on Andrassy ut for €1200/sqm. It is currently giving her a return of 7% on a lease signed until mid 2008. I've helped her and rented it to friends of friends of mine and could have done so several times over. Capital appreciation potential should be good for properties like this, bought at the right price in premier locations.

In addition, District I prices have fallen in recent years - by 4.9% since 2004. District V has remained stable and shows small gains in the last 1.5 years. Although inflation eats up the entire gain, it's important to note that overall, second hand apartments in Budapest have risen by 7% over the last year according to two separate independent reports I've read, compared to a 0.93% decrease from 2004-2005. The most expensive properties in the city centre in recent years were sold in Southern District V - Belgrad Rakpart area and not the Lipotvaros area.

You're identifying smaller issues but you're missing the overall picture.
 
To be honest your posts are about your friends and friends' friends. They are nice stories and give a pink view of Budapest. But the reality is not pink at all. I understand you can get GROSS 6-8% yield(with TAX - increasing tax in Hungary from 2000) in downtown. But this does not mean downtown modell is the key to success.

I have been working on renting market for 5 years. I used to be specialised in Buda side such as district 1,2,12. This was my first period of my life when I learnt a lot about Buda property market. Buda market is very strong as well as downtown market. The main difference is the type of tenants. While downtown is student driven market, buda is wealthy Hungarians driven market plus big foreign families who relocated to Budapest:

- American, English, French and Austrian High School in Buda
- International kinder gardens in Buda
- Private schools in Buda
- Prime Minister, the President and Government Residences in Buda

budapest, you are a bit older than me but still very young. You relocated to Budapest 2-3 years ago (I guess). You do your business as you wish. But your point of view and business model is far from global view related to Budapest. Downtown is obvious important in all Cities but everybody thinks the same. In this case, oversupply, overpricing and difficulties in future are expected becasue everybody moves with trends. If we look at prices in district 5, price increase has not been taken place since 2003 (in general). This is a fact and it is proven by other investors who purchased apartments here (not friends!)

District 1's price is constantly increasing (in general). Buda market is Hungarian driven and local based market seems to be favourable comparing to a foreign investors based downtown where prices are definietly overpriced (even looks cheap but living standards are very very low...- noise, air pollution, parking, traffic, dusty).

I understand your point of view and absolutely clear to me that you believe in district 5. However, I believe in a broad sense of budapest property investment: Pest is overpriced and oversupplied while buda has good business advantages in long term because reach people does not seem to want to move to Pest. Why?

Do you think Bono will move close to St. Stephen's Green from Dalkey in Dublin when public transport has been improved? No, definietly not!

If there is a market niche in Budapest Buda is that because Pest is too common place where everything is driven by YOU! Be very careful because level of investors are still very low comparing to size of Hungarian market. But there are districts with high foreign ownership in Budapest such as district 5, 6 and 7. You have to sell the apartment sooner or later. If investors found a better place or better type of property investment than district 5 and or classic apartment in district 5 in next 10 years time, it might cause you and your friends a headache.

Good investors need to know local buyers and their interest and preferences. The biggest mistake made by foreign investors was the overvaluing areas and property investments of Budapest where Hungarians do not want to live or invest...If you want to sell your apartment you need to find another foreign investor, otherwise, you would be in a big trouble...

What seems to be a gold today you cannot be sure it will be also gold tomorrow...
 
My posts are not only about people I know. I view approximately 30 properties per month in Budapest. I have contacts throughout the property industry, who I keep in contact with on a regular basis. My posts are absolutely not based on just my friends' experiences. This is yet another inaccurate assumption that you've made. I view properties mainly in V, VI, I, XIII, IX, XI, VII.

My point of view does actually concur with most people I speak to and with all of the major management companies I've spoken to. I've been a property renovator and investor since shortly after I graduated from university in 1999. I believe you graduated only last year. I started researching the Bp market in 2001 but did not purchase in District V until 2006, when I noticed that new opportunities were available there. Smaller foreign investors had already stopped investing in this market by 2004. Downtown Budapest is totally different in 2006/2007 and has an entirely new set up of potentials and pitfalls, but now with better opportunities. Some sellers at least are being more realistic about their price expectations. There is absolutely not an oversupply of quality properties at lower prices. The opposite is true. There is only an oversupply of overpriced properties or apartments with some major problem.

Looking at general statistics doesn't work so well in Bp but the reality is that District I prices have fallen in recent years, while District V hasn't, even though it was the over-heated market during the early years of this decade. Since the end of the boom here, the District I average has fallen by 4.9%, while District V fell but then recovered to the same level as before. Several estate agents have informed me that the smaller apartment market in downtown Pest is almost purely taken up by local buyers - renovated apartments on good streets, approx. 15M HUF. My own research also confirms this. Try finding a good renovated apartment for 300,000HUF/sqm anywhere in the city centre.

My reason for concentrating my investments on the downtown area is that I understand this market and the type of tenants who want to rent here. Lower-grade (below middle-management level) positions are plentiful here and employees of companies such as IBM, Nokia, etc. tend to want to live as centrally as possible in the cultural and social centre of the city. I don't rule out District I. There are good opportunities there also and prices are quite repressed at the minute. However, V is more popular from a rental perspective and offers better opportunities in the current market.

In relation to the original question about Fiath Haz, the figures simply don't add up, so I wouldn't invest in a project like this.

The St. Stephen's Green/Dalkey comparison is a good one. The price per square metre and rentability of a property on St. Stephen's Green is much higher than the average Dalkey price, despite it being an affluent suburb and Stephen's Green being an expensive and noisy part of the city centre with traffic problems.

Your suggestion that the 'new city centre' will be where people want to live is quite outlandish and seems to be your own opinion rather than based on any research. Of course developers and those interested in selling new property here will suggest this but few others. You cannot move a city centre that easily. Budapest already has one of the most fantastic downtown areas in Europe. Furthermore, trying to sell a property close to the Danube in District XIII at a reasonable profit is likely to be much more difficult in years to come. This area will have thousands of overpriced, standard new-build apartments, many of which have been purchased by foreign investors. Space is not limited here and buyers are likely to favour brand new developments. In my opinion, only a few higher-end developments (e.g. Prestige Towers) are likely to remain desirable in the long term.

In contrast, the number of investors who purchased the right apartments at the right price in central Pest is probably quite limited. Many invested here, but as far as I can see, only a minority were able to do it successfully. Dealing with private sellers or with local rather than international agents makes a huge difference in terms of price and the quality of the property.

If the standard-quality modern apartments of the Budapest suburbs were to continue to be worth more than the prestigious neo-classical and secessionist downtown property, then Budapest would be an absolute exception on the European property stage.

I appreciate your point of view, so please don't assume that I just post my own opinions. Everything I post comes from researching this market and from my experience and research in various markets across Europe. We both want to experience success in the Bp market, so please accept that people can have different valid perspectives about the same thing. There is much more to be gained from a sharing of knowledge from different sources than from antagonism.

In a separate matter, I'd appreciate if you could remove the offensive statements you made near the start of a post you made yesterday.
 
Hey budapest,

New city centre is not my own view:

- Danube based city centre on Pest and Buda side
- district 9, 13 (new downtown) next to Danube
- district 11,1,2,3 next to Danube

Examples:

- district 13: the most developing district in Budapest (thousands of new apartments, parks, business centers, shopping centres, offices, etc...)

- district 13: Vaci ut the new office road

- district 9: DunaPest Residences, Castrum House, Millenium City, Office towers, new parks, Theather, Palace of Art

- district 9: new extra developments over the last bridge Called Duna Center as residential and business area with high towers

- district 11: The biggest development has started over the last bridge in the bay, thousands of new apartments with green areas, lesiure centres, offices

District 11 is the most developing district in buda.

What I think is that your point of view about district 5 is very close to early investors' view who came to Budapest to invest. You are more sophisticated but expectations are the same even if district 5 was a better place to invest in 2001 because prices are stopped around 2003. Dstrict 5 is the least developed district because no more space for new developments or green areas (district 5 is a grey part of the city and classic buildings can be re-built as a new such as Dorottya Court, Garibaldi, etc. but this a different story).

In 1999 you were around 20. It sounds a bit earlier to get a university degree. It is true I get my degree (BA with honour, Oxford) last year but I have been working in renting plus property management business since 2002. What is more, my dissertation was about Budapest Residential Market and foreign investors.

I definietly do research every day and keep my eyes out while you focus on district 5 and district 6 only!

I respect your point of view and business modell but I suggest you be very careful when you talk about potential property investments in Budapest. Property market is more than district 5!
 
Well is the fighting over. I think I understand both sides and both have their merits.

20years ago I was the first English man to buy in a small village in the south west of France. The locals said they saw me coming and I had overpaid for the old original stone house on the hill. Much better to have a new small property that's easy to heat and look after they told me, oh and of course no local will ever buy it back!

Well what a surprise the foreigners loved the area and kept on coming, prices esculated rapidly and anything in stone with character is very difficult to come by. And guess what the locals now say 'you bloody foreigners have got all the good houses'. I have a sneaking suspicion that in years to come, those that sold good classic appartments in central Budapest will kick themselves.
 
Hello plotman,

What you say about appreciation of country side is a good example of importance of normal living standards (fresh air, green, hills, valley, quiet area). In Hungary, for instance, Lake Balaton is a popular place for Hungarians again.

Country side vs. Downtown of Capital city is an old story. In Hungary, if you do not want to live out of Budapest but you want to live in green area, etc. Buda is a good option.

The reason I paid your attantion to Buda and importance of normal living stadnards (lack of these normal standards in downtown) is to talk about a new aspect of property investments.

What I think is very similar to your story. Green areas and better living places will be appreciated in Budapest if you want to enjoy big city life because you need (fresh) air and (good) food and drink if you want to keep alive. Simple and easy to understand.

And I am sure apartments in downtown will be always rentable (but rent review is a very critical point - the more investor the more apartment to let). However, the question is who wants to be a buyer of classic apartments in old downtown in the next 10-15 years?! Pros and cons but time will show.
 
plotman, you hit on a very relevant point, which any property professional will be aware of. Populations at different economic levels require different things from their properties. Socio-economic factors are vital in evaluating any property market.