DrMoriarty
Moderator
- Messages
- 5,173
G'day, all.
I've used the search function and have hunted around a bit online, but can't find an clear answer to the following - maybe someone here can help?
My kid's Xbox developed the notorious "Red Ring of Death" problem about 10 months into warranty, so I rang the shop we bought it in and said I wanted to return it to them. They initially tried to fob me off with a lot of nonsense along the lines of "Oh, acksherly Microsoft have told us that customers should contact their helpline directly, bla, bla, bla, they'll look after it... [etc.]" until I made it clear that I was aware of the retailer's obligations under consumer law. So, later that day, we dropped the console in and, unprompted, they offered a replacement console. But they insisted that the warranty was hereafter only valid for 12 months from the date of purchase of the original (faulty) console — i.e. for another month and a half.
Now, I know that Microsoft have extended (to three years) their manufacturer's warranty in respect of the RRoD/E74 error. But my question is should the retailer — who has elected to replace, rather than repair or refund the faulty item — not have to provide a 12-month warranty in respect of the new console?
Thanks in advance for any advice/links to relevant consumer legislation...
I've used the search function and have hunted around a bit online, but can't find an clear answer to the following - maybe someone here can help?
My kid's Xbox developed the notorious "Red Ring of Death" problem about 10 months into warranty, so I rang the shop we bought it in and said I wanted to return it to them. They initially tried to fob me off with a lot of nonsense along the lines of "Oh, acksherly Microsoft have told us that customers should contact their helpline directly, bla, bla, bla, they'll look after it... [etc.]" until I made it clear that I was aware of the retailer's obligations under consumer law. So, later that day, we dropped the console in and, unprompted, they offered a replacement console. But they insisted that the warranty was hereafter only valid for 12 months from the date of purchase of the original (faulty) console — i.e. for another month and a half.
Now, I know that Microsoft have extended (to three years) their manufacturer's warranty in respect of the RRoD/E74 error. But my question is should the retailer — who has elected to replace, rather than repair or refund the faulty item — not have to provide a 12-month warranty in respect of the new console?
Thanks in advance for any advice/links to relevant consumer legislation...