hastalavista
Registered User
- Messages
- 449
you're having a laugh aren't you ?
Imagine the front page news around the world - "Irish not bothered to rescue 21 people because hastalavista thinks it's too expensive".
I've joined a debate on this issue on another web site and there is a single lone voice like yours with everyone else, myself included against your argument.
What about mountain rescue, ambulance crews, fire crews, safety marshals and medics at motorbike races, medical docs on standby at gaa matches ....... etc
I'm surprised that this event is reliant on the emergency services. Like other sports, surely they put in place their own arrangements to cater for emergencies. They should be hiring at least a couple of lifeboat crews and a rescue helicopter given the history of this event.
There is a hugh difference between backup at a GAA match and the case in point.
Yes let them drown, why not, they should have had enough life-craft and let the other race boats pick them up, but no because it adds to the weight etc.
Commercial boat rescues etc I have no issue with but I don't thing this lot should be rescued at a cost to the tax payer
Again, what do you think the cost of the rescue was? According to the Indo the Baltimore lifeboat (and its volunteer crew) was on an exercise in the area when they got the call. Because that's what they do - they practise rescues (using fuel etc - the 'costs') until they have a real rescue. For all those involved (and a big well done to them as Sunny say), I suspect this will be a highlight of their rescue careers considering what could have happened (and has happened before in the Fastnet race) - a big rescue like this makes it all worthwhile and the publicity will help their fundraising efforts.There is a hugh difference between backup at a GAA match and the case in point.
Yes let them drown, why not, they should have had enough life-craft and let the other race boats pick them up, but no because it adds to the weight etc.
Commercial boat rescues etc I have no issue with but I don't thing this lot should be rescued at a cost to the tax payer
That's just not practical given the distances/speeds involved.
I'd be surprised if the organisers were picking up the tab for the rescue though, as they do for medics, marshalls, fire crew. etc. at other high-risk events.
I can guarantee you that even if the race provided what you suggest, all the official rescue services would also have gone out so there would have been no cost saving. The Baltimore lifeboat and the helicopter crews just wouldn't have got the international pats on the back that they are getting now nor the potential for increased funding...I dont agree that its not practical. Given the profile of this event, surely they could afford to have 3-4 rescue craft spaced along the route? Surely they could afford to have a rescue helicopter on standby?
I can guarantee you that even if the race provided what you suggest, all the official rescue services would also have gone out so there would have been no cost saving. The Baltimore lifeboat and the helicopter crews just wouldn't have got the international pats on the back that they are getting now nor the potential for increased funding...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?