Starting in reverse: I never give anyone a finger. If I react, I blow kisses as it un-nerves the aggressor so if I did anything it would have been that but even that was unlikely.
As you have recalled the incident, I would make full statement, in writing, setting out the full facts. You do not know her name but the Gardai do, so you point out how she was in the wrong. See what they do about that!Thanks guys, I feel a bit better about it now. She did say that that was the end of it so hopefully that's it.
As you have recalled the incident, I would make full statement, in writing, setting out the full facts. You do not know her name but the Gardai do, so you point out how she was in the wrong. See what they do about that!
The Guards are ignoring it because its stupid. The OP should do the same. Having read his account, he was in the wrong for beeping because he was stuck on a luas line. He shouldn't have crossed the line until he was sure he would get across. He was obviously travelling too close to the car in front if he got stuck becuase the car in front stopped for whatever reason. He had no right to beep at her.
All a bit childish on behalf of the other driver but not worth losing sleep over. There will be no file kept.
To correct you, I moved forward when there was plenty of room, the car in front of me braked hard to let someone out of the bus lane (someone who shouldn't have been in it) and I had already moved forward. I was in no way driving too close to the car in front of me, and I beeped to alert them of my presence as permitted in the rules of the road.
.
Starting in reverse: I never give anyone a finger. If I react, I blow kisses as it un-nerves the aggressor so if I did anything it would have been that but even that was unlikely.
Any thoughts?
To correct you, I moved forward when there was plenty of room, the car in front of me braked hard to let someone out of the bus lane (someone who shouldn't have been in it) and I had already moved forward. I was in no way driving too close to the car in front of me, and I beeped to alert them of my presence as permitted in the rules of the road.
So at what point did you blow the kiss at them?
In your opening post you say that she blew her car horn at you now you are saying that you blew your car horn at her.
She blew first...then you blew second......
The Garda received a written complaint and as part of her job she investigated it. Her conslusion after investigation was that no further action was called for. That seems fair and transparent to meWhat's the legal standpoint as regards Gardai acting on the opinion of another road user? ...
And rightly so IMHO. An investigating Guard asks questions to both broaden and deepen her knowledge of the matter at issue. She will not / cannot reveal the identities of possible witnesses to a possible prosecution as this could lead to intimidation.... Have had two instances of that over the years - in both cases, I asked for the name of the person making the accusation - but was refused...
If a prosection ensues then yes, in a court of law... If it was taken further, presumably they would have to make themselves known? ...
OP is not entitled to see what might be regarded as a privileged communication....
In the case of the OP, if it's something in writing, is she entitled to that information under data protection? i.e. access to any info with her name on it...hmm...although I guess her name isn't on it - just reg plate number...so probably not accessible via data protection?
Your points are completely valid. However, this can work in reverse. i.e. where the complainant recognises the vehicle and based potentially on their own prejudice, makes the complaint. Before you start to think this is far fetched, it wouldn't be in my case - given the time of night and specific time - with a volume of cars hitting the same stretch of road following work.And rightly so IMHO. An investigating Guard asks questions to both broaden and deepen her knowledge of the matter at issue. She will not / cannot reveal the identities of possible witnesses to a possible prosecution as this could lead to intimidation.
What reasons would you have for asking for the identities of the complainants?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?