T
Galway City Council to meet over Eyre Square dispute
Last updated: 27-06-05, 17:12
Galway City Council is to meet this evening to discuss the dispute over the Eyre Square redevelopment in the city.
Construction workers on the controversial €9 million project today walked off site. Work on the city centre refurbishment ground to a halt after teams of builders failed to man the job.
A spokeswoman for Samuel Kingston Construction refused to comment on the situation saying the company would be making an official statement sometime "in the next 24 hours."
A spokesman for Galway City Council said officials were seeking legal advice after employees from Samuel Kingston Construction walked off. He said the workers had abandoned the job without notice.
"Galway City Council wishes to express our deep disappointment and annoyance at the decision of Kingston Construction to walk off-site at Eyre Square despite repeated and ongoing attempts with the contractor to secure the completion of the contract by the November deadline," he said.
The spokesman said no warning had been given of the stoppage, adding all work carried out on-site, under terms of the contract, had been paid for in full by Galway City Council.
Work on the redevelopment of the square began in May of last year and was due to be completed by November. But the redevelopment has been dogged by criticism from the outset due the slow pace of work and the massive disruption to businesses in the city centre.
The Health and Safety Authority (HSA) carried out a number of inspections at Eyre Square over the last year. No safety issues were identified by the HSA that would warrant the site being closed.
Earlier this year workers walked off site in a row over wages.
© 2005 ireland.com
Because the great God of privatisation dictates that we have to add a private sector profit margin onto the costs of all such initiatives.Henny Penny said:Presumably the company in question can be pursued throught the courts for breech of contract? Why didn't Galway Corpo do the job themselves from the outset? Surely they could find enough shovel nursers and hole analysers to do the job?
don't forget the bit about it still being cheaper and quicker (in general) to get the private sector to do the job. Before you ask; no, I don't have the links to back that up, I've just been listening to the radio, watching the TV and reading the papers for the last 20 years.RainyDay said:Because the great God of privatisation dictates that we have to add a private sector profit margin onto the costs of all such initiatives.
Because the great God of privatisation dictates that we have to add a private sector profit margin onto the costs of all such initiatives.
Purple said:don't forget the bit about it still being cheaper and quicker (in general) to get the private sector to do the job. Before you ask; no, I don't have the links to back that up, I've just been listening to the radio, watching the TV and reading the papers for the last 20 years.
Before the deal with Jarvis was finalised, the Department estimated that it would result in a cost saving to the State of around 6% when compared to the traditional approach. Our analysis found shortcomings in the Department’s estimation. It is likely that the final deal with Jarvis could be between 8% and 13% more expensive than conventional procurement and operation.
Is maintaining infrastructure like roads, bridges, public squares part of the core activities of AIB, BOfI, Intel, MS etc?daltonr said:Would AIB, BofI, Intel, Microsoft, or any other company in Ireland create a contruction division within their own company to hire and train builders to work on their premises or etc? Of course not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?