I just had a look at the IT article referred to above.
The explanation of how ETR works is complete rubbish.
The italics are quotes from the Irish Times article.
The ABCs of ETRs: How they work Company XYZ owes Company ABC Ltd €105,000 for goods and services. When ABC goes to XYZ for payment of the invoice, XYZ offers two options: 1) pay it in full in three months’ time or, 2) pay €100,000, a discount of €5,000, now.
NO. The terms of payment for an invoice are set by the supplier not the purchaser.
ABC decides to take the €100,000 now rather than wait three months to get paid in full.
Now XYZ has to get the €100,000 to pay ABC to clear the invoice in full.
Rather than paying this out of its own funds, it goes to the Debtors Exchange trading platform where the invoice will be purchased from XYZ. This means that Debtors Exchange will give XYZ €100,000 now so that they can pay ABC.
NO. XYZ does not own the invoice and therefore cannot sell it. The supplier owns the invoice not the purchaser.
Three months later, XYZ will repay Debtors Exchange €105,000. For XYZ, this approach allows them to buy credit at a much cheaper rate than an overdraft or a bank loan.
That makes no commercial sense. There is no way that this could be cheaper than bank finance.
For Debtors Exchange, it earns them a return of €5,000, or 5 per cent, on the €100,000.
But where does Debtors Exchange get the €100,000?
This comes from the investors, with Debtors Exchange negotiating a rate and term with financial advisors.
Costello & Tarpey, for example, offers a rate of 3.75 per cent for one year for its customers.
Invoice financing arrangements are with the supplier not the purchaser. This is because the supplier owns the asset.
Someone at the IT does not know what they are talking about. I wonder if I could get a job there writing about sport or maybe music?