for budgetary purposes
The annualised net return of the MSCI World Index (EUR) was 6.29% from 29 December 2000 to 28 February 2025.
Obviously that excludes any fund charges or personal taxes.
Isn't that an actively managed fund rather than a passive fund tracking the MSCI World Index so possibly an apples and oranges comparison?If I do a annualised return on Zurich Life's Dynamic (Mixed Asset Fund with indicative equity range of 75% - 100%) over exact same period and include all (other ongoing & portfolio transaction fund) costs, and an AMC of 0.75%, it's coming out net of all charges at 6.73%.
Isn't that an actively managed fund rather than a passive fund tracking the MSCI World Index so possibly an apples and oranges comparison?
Who mentioned funds or ETFs?Yes the funds will have non recoverable DWT withheld at the fund level e.g 15% for US dividends. An Irish domiciled ETF tracking the FTSE All-World index will lose around 0.2%- 0.3%I think
He has about €1m to invest. Part of this sum will be invested in equities.
After tax and charges, what do people feel is a reasonable long-term net rate of return to use for budgetary purposes for the portion invested in equities?
Fair enough, they do mention 33% which implies direct investment or accessing US domiciled funds subject to CGT I suppose. With a 1m fund I’d probably recommend using funds or ETFs but each to their own. The estimate of 0.2-0.3% still stands if they go as diversified as possible (which I would recommend). If they are stock picking then you can’t estimate any of this at all, it depends what they invest in! What’s their expected alpha??The original query is simply about "equity investments" and the original poster's focus so far seems to imply direct equity investment?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?