Engineered Doors -Primed

Status
Not open for further replies.

BMD

Registered User
Messages
133
Hi,

Does anyone have any suggestions on a good suppliers of engineered doors (primed) and what price I should be paying for these. I am getting the door leaf only (no ironmongery, frames etc.).

I want a good quality heavy door (45mm).

Thanks

BMD
 
Why does it need to be "engineered".

Has it got a special purpose?
Will it serve as a fire door?
Is it because its so big?
Is it for security?
Is it for sound?

[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
Want something in my price range and I want something that wont warp

Has it got a special purpose? No
Will it serve as a fire door? Yes
Is it because its so big? No
Is it for security? No
Is it for sound? No
 
If its a fire door then call it a fire door - it must be fitted with the fire door set and ironmongery that matches its fire safety certificate.
It is not good practice for a layperson to state that he's "getting the door leaf only" - it is a false economy to revise the specification unless you are competent to do so.
A fire door may seem only to be a piece of timber that plugs a hole, but the correct installation and effective sealing of the hole depends on a lot of things which work together to give the desired result.

- the density, integrity and fire resistance of the door itself
- the sealing and correct fitting of the lining and architrave
- the sizing and density of the frame into which it sits
- the sizing and effectiveness and completeness of any intumescent strips
- the effectiveness and completeness of the smoke seals
- the bedding of the ironmongery into intumescent paste or strips
- the quality of the ironmongery - hinges, self-closing device and handles
- the dimensional accuracy of the door and frame (the penny test)
- the plumbness and squareness into which the door will sit
- the integrity and fire reisitance of the wall into which it is placed
- the lack of a lock /presence of a tumbler operated mechanism from the inside.
- the presence or otherwise of alarm-deactivated electromagnetic door-holder-openers (especially if this door is in a corridor)

Don't skimp on a fire door or attendant items is the best advice I could offer.

  • If the gap between the frame and the door is too great, neither smoke seal nor intumescent strip may work.
  • If the frame and lining are not properly sealed to the wall, the door will be less effective.
  • Unless there is a compliant security mechanism fitted [including press bars and tumbler locks] the door may help the building become a death trap.
  • Only accept fire doors which have fire certs offered with them together with a specification for the fire door sets (ironmongery, fixing, seals, frames, grounds etc).
  • Make sure these are correctly fitted by a competent person and inspected and certified after fitting by a competent building professional whose experience and qualification are suitable to that task.
All that having been said, fire doors are usually dimensionally stable within the standard ranges.
A fire door must be dimensionally stable in a fire emergency situation and so the build quality is higher.

One cannot obtain a fire rating for a non-standard door simply by interpolation of its composition.
A Fire Safety Cert may not be in place for the specific size of door and/or the timber material you require.

Your door may be a once off door design and you may be required to obtain an independent certificate for your once off door.
It must be tested individually, together with its ironmongery and door set and your budget and programme are secondary to this.
I have seen one or two contractors try to justify substandard items because of budgetary or time constraints - it never impresses.

The last time I oversaw a Fire Door Test we had to send the door away for testing and a Report to TRADA Chiltern.
We discovered that fast growing hardwoods have less density that European slow growing hardwoods and therefore less intrinsic fire resistance.
We had to revise the design and specification of the door to make it compliant, but if we hadn't tested it we wouldn't have known we had to do this.

I strongly suggest that you contact a competent experienced architect (some just do fire safety certificate applications) or reputable, qualified Fire Safety Consultant with experience in this area (some just do fire engineering solutions) for more advice on whether or not there may be a necessity for such a test, and how to go about it.

If you are dealing with a manufacturer who starts contradicting the advice I have offered, I would strongly advise taking retaining and then taking the advice of a competent building professional with experience in this area, as opposed to the guy who may be only trying to sell you a piece of timber.

[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
All I was looking for is a recommendation on the supply of engineered doors

.... as I have said before I have employed a very competent qualified architect

I'm looking for doors for a house...its not that complicated
 
On the fire door issue...all your advice is very much appreciated and I have all these areas covered...

that aside I am still only looking for the door leaf and one which has 30 minutes fire resistance

any advice on good suppliers would be appreciated
 
BMD,

I can only offer words of advice, but as I said, looking for fire doors in isolation is not for laypeople.
If you have appointed an architect, use him to assess and recommend a source for these specialist items, their ironmongery and doorsets.

After all, he'll be the one certifying the building.


[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
Have a look here [broken link removed]
Not sure if these [broken link removed] are engineered or solid.
 
Can't remember the manufacturer but they supply clondalkin providers with engineered doors, excellent quality
 
I finally decided to get my doors from Doors Ireland/ Dublin Door and Timber Company....probably turned out to be my biggest regret with the build...the standard of the doors was shocking...a few of them were good (including the ones that I looked at in the store) but the majority were warped, not plumb, panels sitting proud of each other etc.

On top of all that their customer service was atrocious...

Just a word of warning for anyone starting out on this road...I wish I had been warned
 
[
]
"I wish I had been warned"

Are you saying the advice AAM offered was not adequate to the task?

We need to know what to do to improve on the level of advice that was offered.


ONQ.


[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
The only advice I didn't get was to stay away from this particular company...I'm only warning people out there...
 
I didn't say the advice from AAM wasn't adequate...AAM isn't the only source of advice in the world...I'm just saying that I would have liked to get this advice but I'm not complaining that I didn't get it

I just want to warn fellow users.
 
I have no advice on improving AAM... in general it is an excellent service...
 
I am concerned that someone using an experienced architect may have been led to purchase substandard doors.

Was he involved in the build and did he advise on the doors is what I'm asking.
If he wasn't involved then you weren't using an experienced architect.

Many people use an architect at planning stage and then decouple for the build, asking him to return to perform a visual inspection on cert at the end.

This can result in a poor quality to the built work, because with no professional inspection, its up to the builder and the client to set the standard.

So either he researched suppliers and vetted their products or not - or you did all of that. I'm asking what occured.

ONQ.


[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
partly because when I asked the question and you had the post blocked because you thought it was a repeat of a previous question (which it wasn't)

I have no power to have posts "blocked".

The site has a policy against duplicate posts.
The site also has a policy requiring thread titles to be descriptive.

If a post gets deleted on AAM it has to be referred to the moderators or site owner first.
I have no power to delete other people's posts and the moderators are quick to deal with posters who refer posts inappropriately.

If your post was deleted its because the moderators - who may not have been referred by someone posting in the thread - deem it unsuitable, not me.
 
I'm only warning people who are researching suppliers in future....
 
The point to this line of questioning is that if your architect had advised you to use these doors then its possible he could be held liable in the matter.
Architects, being professionals, are supposed to act to a higher standard of care than non-professionals who are not architects.

That is why I always advise that people use building professionals on building projects in the first place.
Its why I try to determine where they have used an architect if defects are discovered.

Perhaps this advice will be useful to you or others reading AAM.


ONQ.


[broken link removed]

All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.
 
Thats great..thanks for the advice.

I just wanted to warn people about this supplier for future reference
 
Status
Not open for further replies.