Hi all,
Perhaps this has been covered already. My wife recently successfully bid on two items on e-bay, before bidding, she contacted the seller to ask if she would get a reduction in p&p charges should she bbe successful on both items. The seller stated that she would reduce the costs were this the case.
After the auction ended, my wife contacted the seller to arrange payment and was informed that one item was sold too cheaply and that the seller had meant to put a reserve price on (no mention was made of this when my wife contacted her re p&p costs). The net result was that the seller refused to sell both items.
My wife contacted e-bay and after numerous generic e-mails, finally recieved correspondance to say that the seller would be investigated - end of story.
My wife is now quite upset as she really wanted the two items and had been searching for them for quite a while. As far as i am concerned, my wife had a valid and enforceable contract and should be entitled to the goods but as the seller is in England and the money involved is relatively small, initiating legal action is probably not really on the cards.
It seems to me that e-bay should have some responsibility here for enforcing the contract. I assume that they took their fees from the seller, and as such it occurred to me that there may be some form of corollary contract arising between my wife and e-bay as the auctioneers. I do remember a case a number of years back where an auctioneer of plant equipment refused to sell items which had no reserve and had to pay the winning bidder the full amount of the bid as compensation.
if anyone has come accross a similar situation, i would be grateful for any advice
Cheers