“They [structured products] are horrible investments for retail investors…Simple portfolios of bonds, stocks will beat structured products 99.5 percent of the time because of the heavy profit built into the pricing”
- *Craig McCann, former SEC economist and founder of Securities Litigation & Consulting Group
At first glance, structured products may look enticing; after all, they offer you some upside and protection on the downside. What could be so bad about that?
Perhaps the very first principle of investing is that there is no such thing as return without risk. No free lunches risk can never be obliterated; it can only be transferred from one party to another. If your broker is offering you a product that promises partial upside of the market with downside protection, you can be absolutely sure that the party that has agreed to take on the downside risk on your behalf is being paid to bear that risk, so the question you should naturally ask is, “Who is paying this party to take on my risk?” The answer, of course, lies in the mirror, but the true costs are not transparent. The cost may show up at the end as a much lower return than would have been received in a boring index fund.
One of the key points to understand about structured products is that they are constructed out of positions in the Market and the issuer of the structured product, after collecting your payment, will buy these building blocks at a lower price and pocket the difference as immediate profit, after paying your broker his commission.
Structured products carry default risk of the issuing company. Buyers of Lehman Principal Protected Notes have had to swallow this bitter pill. So even though structured products may appear to provide market-based returns, investors in these products are actually staking their nest egg on the fortunes of just one company. This is always a bad idea!
An additional problem with structured products is liquidity. The hapless investor who needs to sell one before maturity should expect a bad investment experience.