Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,774
2) Worst Case:
Bank waits until the last minute of the 6 years, issues judgement which will take a further 12 years to expire so borrower has to wait 18 years before they can return debt free.
Can it be worse than this.
You agree to sell your house after 5 years of not being able to pay properly, takes a couple of years to sell, after sale the bank ignores you for just under 6 years and issues a summons for judgment, takes 2 to 3 years from then to get judgement. Judgment I understand lasts then 12 years. You're now back in employment/have inheritence/assets and close to year 12, bank issue instalment proceedings and after some time they get an instalment order. And the instalment decision allows you a basic sum to live on and everything else to the bank.
If the above scenario possible?
Any shortfall is only crystallised when the asset is actually sold.
So the statute of limitations only runs from this date.
The bank, IRBC , will not entertain a debt write off and my personal family home is in negative equity of 90,000 so their's no point in them going after that for now.
The bank can institute proceedings within 6 years of the accrual of the debt. That stops the Statute of Limitations running. The debtor can extend the 6 year period by acknowledging the debt (must be in writing)or part paying the debt.
mf
So what should a debtor do if they want their debts to disappear?
Don't contact the bank to acknowledge the debt.
Don't make any payment at all.
Go to Australia as the bank is very unlikely to bother getting a judgment against you.
Come back after 6 years, debt-free.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?