I read this with interest,and while the internet does allow us to highlight issues when we feel our money is being spent incorrectly,it can just end up being one sector against the other.
But this looks like its all sectors who pay tax having a say on what their money is spent on.
We already have a tax payers alliance - its called the electorate.
I have difficulties with this type of organisation as they invariably represent a small proportion of the electorate and tend to have an ideological bias towards the people who run them. In the same way that e.g. a Union cannot collectively bargain with an employer unless a majority of people members, I dont see why any group should be allowed set itself up as representing taxpayers unless the majority of taxpayers are members.
I read this with interest,and while the internet does allow us to highlight issues when we feel our money is being spent incorrectly,it can just end up being one sector against the other.
But this looks like its all sectors who pay tax having a say on what their money is spent on.
Indeed, maybe if our money was spent carefully/properly/less waste fully. that's what would be achieved.
We achieve this by releasing pioneering research into taxation and government spending. Our research team uses the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act to uncover information previously hidden from taxpayers. In the last year we’ve written 28 papers based on more than 4,100 FOI requests. We also publish books to build on our research, most recently Let Them Eat Carbon and How to Cut Public Spending (and Still Win an Election).
February's Anti-War March of 100,000 people was reminiscent of the great
Tax Marches of 1979 and 1980, when as many as 700,000 marched in every
town and city of Ireland in protest against the unfair tax burden on the PAYE
sector. Those were not protests against high tax, but were against unfair
taxes. Workers were paying most (87%) income tax while the self-employed
and farmers paid little and companies too were able to avoid and evade tax.