Hi, just wondered if someone could clarify this if possible?
Just had a district court Judge strike out access order over Jurisdiction problems.
Proceedings brought previously at the same court and the same Judge originally granted interim access order and case was adjourned.
Neither applicant or respondent resident in that county (but in a neighboring one)I was told proceedings were brought on basis that respondent works full time in the same county as the court (both solicitors had offices there also)
And as I mention the same Judge in the same case had granted an interim access order and adjourned. Then on the adjournment date struck the case out because of improper jurisdiction.
I'm told both solicitors accepted service and the Judge was the problem.
How can this be when he was satisfied before?
I am told that I now have no access order in place to see my son.
Is this correct? Or does the interim one still stand?
I was expecting to get increased access.... and am shocked at the goings on in the court. What can I do apart from re-apply in the local court?
which all takes time and with no access in place, so disappointing for both me and my son.
Any advice?
Can I appeal, etc? or fast track another application?
Just had a district court Judge strike out access order over Jurisdiction problems.
Proceedings brought previously at the same court and the same Judge originally granted interim access order and case was adjourned.
Neither applicant or respondent resident in that county (but in a neighboring one)I was told proceedings were brought on basis that respondent works full time in the same county as the court (both solicitors had offices there also)
And as I mention the same Judge in the same case had granted an interim access order and adjourned. Then on the adjournment date struck the case out because of improper jurisdiction.
I'm told both solicitors accepted service and the Judge was the problem.
How can this be when he was satisfied before?
I am told that I now have no access order in place to see my son.
Is this correct? Or does the interim one still stand?
I was expecting to get increased access.... and am shocked at the goings on in the court. What can I do apart from re-apply in the local court?
which all takes time and with no access in place, so disappointing for both me and my son.
Any advice?
Can I appeal, etc? or fast track another application?