What reasons did they give for this advice?I got recommended a 5 year fixed, and was quoted 5.6% for 250K loan. I have a desposit of 150K plus - terms 20 years (as I am in my 30's).
That is dumb advice in my opinion. If you don't need the extra money don't borrow it. If you do then you pay interest that you don't need to and you also have higher mortgage protection life assurance premiums.I only wanted to borrow 200K but was told to go for the bigger sum as could work myself down from here.
What sort of financial advisor is this?I haven't been too happy with my FA services
No - they are generally subject to review between approval in principle and drawdown.My questions are: Am I right, does the lender fix the interest rate for mortagage offers in prinicple?
A few months I think generally?In general how long are they valid?
Check the rate table in the Irish Times property supplement on a Thursday or similar rate tables in other newspapers or on other websites. See here also:Can any advise, on who is offering the best 2 year fixed mortgage with reasonable terms (not 30 years) 20 preferably or 25 max?
Check out the many existing threads on the fixed versus tracker/variable question. Don't fix unless you must.Is a 2 year fixed the best mortgage to be going for or should I go longer? I know no one can gaze into a crystal ball re interest rates, but I can't see them coming down in the short term.
Some or all of these charge higher rates than other packages so you need to crunch the numbers to see if they are worth it versus taking out a regular mortgage and just making accelerated regular or lump sum over payments as you can afford to (with the money in this case basically locked away unlike a current account/offset mortgage where it remains available for use).I heard about mortgages linked to your current account which can reduce your long term payments. Are these only relevant to variable/tracker mortgages or can it apply with a fixed mortgage?
If he actually said all that you have reported him to have said here then I would run a mile, shop around for myself and maybe contact another more trustworthy broker.When I said originally I wanted to borrow as little as necessary he let agreed I was correct but added "but not from my perspective" (I took it he was refering to commission). Will check him out but think he is reputable.
Incredibly bad advice!- talk to mortgage advisors in banks directly, they probably offer better
rate as avoing this "salesperson middleman",
JR.
As Munsterdude said - what do you think bank tied agents are if not sales people!?!unfortunately most FA are basically SALES PEOPLE
...
- talk to mortgage advisors in banks directly, they probably offer better
rate as avoing this "salesperson middleman",
As Munsterdude said - what do you think bank tied agents are if not sales people!?!
The problem here seems to be that the intermediary in question is offering poor advice. This does not mean that all intermediaries/brokers are untrustworthy!
Bank staff are implicitly tied agents aka sales people.I am unsure what exactly "bank tied agents" refers to?
How so?Your confidential information is more secure dealing directly with banks.
Maybe you just picked the wrong intermediaries and are generalising from an unrepresentative sample?You have to deal with SOMEONE when getting a mortgage,
and the attitude and approach of mortage staff in banks is far less
cut-throat and irresponsible than any FA I have met.
Bank staff sell the products of that BankMunsterdude didnt explain much, and
I am unsure what exactly "bank tied agents" refers to?
I agree there must be some reputable "intermediaries/brokers" out there,
but havent found one!
From personal experience I find dealing directly with banks is far better
than "independant brokers", banks are more flexible and responsible, and
give sensible replies to queries unlike any FA used.
Your confidential information is more secure dealing directly with banks.
No doubt bank staff get some commision out of any deals they make,
its part of the job.
You have to deal with SOMEONE when getting a mortgage,
and the attitude and approach of mortage staff in banks is far less
cut-throat and irresponsible than any FA I have met.
JR.
Bank staff are implicitly tied agents aka sales people.
How so?
Maybe you just picked the wrong intermediaries and are generalising from an unrepresentative sample?
Your posts on this matter seem to contain more vitriol and heat than sound advice and light in my opinion.
I don't think that either is exempt from the rules laid down by the Data Protection Act. As I said - maybe you had particularly bad experiences with mortgage brokers/financial advisors (which you should have complained about to them and, if necessary IFSRA/FSO) but I think it's ridiculous to generalise, tar all such intermediaries with the same brush and to suggest to people that they might be better off talking to tied agents rather than more independent multi-agency intermediaries or authorised advisors.I'm not saying that all bank staff are nice and honest,
but my experience is they are more reliable and sensible than any FA
I've talked to (5+) wrt mortgages, lets just say they were the lesser evil of
the two kinds of salesmen
I dont think Banks give out your confidential information, isnt it illegal??
(apart from credit bureau stuff)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?