there is interference from EU Consumer Law Legislation and the 1980's Act on top of the original 1893 Act. They allow for the right to reject (i.e. reject the goods and get your money back) after some other options have been exhausted (right to cure/repair/replace by the seller).
But the right to reject outright without asking the seller to remedy the situation (i.e. the original 1893 act) is likely to be lost on the "intimation of acceptance".
This is from pg. 297 of Fidelma White's Commercial Law:
"The buyer loses the right to reject the goods if he indicates to the seller that he accepts them. Such indication can be in any form, oral, written or by conduct, provided it is clear and unequivocal. In order to take advantage of this provision, a seller may attempt to get the buyer to sign an "acceptance note" when the goods are delivered. The effect of such notes is not entirely clear and would depend on the circumstances of the case".
Basically, the best thing to do if forced to signed a docket is to write above your name "The signing of this docket does not constitute an intimation of acceptance" and then sign your name. There are a couple of areas in law where there are serious traps for the unwary. This is one of them.
I think they must visit askaboutmoney website. Name & Shame - great power.Well Folks,
I rang them today and they are delivering out a matching suite next week and taking away the old one. Thanks for your help and advice.
Deisce
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?