Defamation question

From Wikipedia

"Slander and libel

The common law origins of defamation lie in the torts of slander (harmful statement in a transitory form, especially speech) and libel[4][5] (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of action.

"Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication.[6] The fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language, gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example in written words, film, compact disc (CD), DVD, blogging and the like, then it is considered libel." The debate whether Internet blogs or Bulletin Boards are publishers is a key subject being addressed, whereas an Internet based community is more akin to conversations in a bar or pub, with content being written as an ongoing dialog which is generally not edited or regulated such as in the publishing industry.[7]"

mf
 
Libel, IMHO. AFAIK, slander refers to spoken defamation (1 to 1, 1 to many but not broadcast), whereas libel is published, written words or broadcast images and / or words (radio, TV, interweb, movie).
 
Libel - Section 15 of the defamation act 1961.

Libel relates to material in permanent form and slander words in impermanent form eg - posting on a message board would be libel.