B
0.25% every few months or about 1% a year! Compare that to the late 80's!
Don't get the significance of the link, can you exlpain?
This thread seems to me to be wildly over-interpreting a number of facts and some anecdotal evidence. In particular, the interpretation of the 300,000 allegedly empty properties seems off, and does not appear to take any account of the large number of properties vacant because
(1) owned by local authorities and requiring substantial renovation / refurbishment to be habitable; (2) owned by private individuals, otherwise as (1); (3) owned by private individual in long term institutional care [e.g. home of an elderly person no longer able to cope, family if any unwilling /unable to sell home]; (4) held as property bank - being constructively derelicted; (5) vacant awaiting new owners to move in, etc.
All of these would be significant contributors, as would abandonment of older rural homes.
An investor who actually chooses to hold a new property empty would - even in the euphoric days of 15% pa capital appreciation - be spectacularly foolish. If you choose to manage a property yourself, yes there's a little bit of hassle, but otherwise there are companies that specialise in that area. Most of the costs are tax deductible, and quite a number would arise whether the place is rented or not [management charges, maintenance...].
This thread seems to me to be wildly over-interpreting a number of facts and some anecdotal evidence. In particular, the interpretation of the 300,000 allegedly empty properties seems off, and does not appear to take any account of the large number of properties vacant because
(1) owned by local authorities and requiring substantial renovation / refurbishment to be habitable; (2) owned by private individuals, otherwise as (1); (3) owned by private individual in long term institutional care [e.g. home of an elderly person no longer able to cope, family if any unwilling /unable to sell home]; (4) held as property bank - being constructively derelicted; (5) vacant awaiting new owners to move in, etc.
All of these would be significant contributors, as would abandonment of older rural homes.
I see the McWilliams RTE series starts tonight. Anyone think this will have an affect on sentiment?
rofl. I have no doubt that those who still can't afford their own home will hang on to his every word and conveniently forget that the property doomsters like McWilliams got it manifestly
wrong in 1999
wrong in 2000
wrong in 2001
wrong in 2002
wrong in 2003
wrong in 2004
wrong in 2005
wrong in 2006 !
and I am not bullish about all property.
rofl. I have no doubt that those who still can't afford their own home will hang on to his every word and conveniently forget that the property doomsters like McWilliams got it manifestly
wrong in 1999
wrong in 2000
wrong in 2001
wrong in 2002
wrong in 2003
wrong in 2004
wrong in 2005
wrong in 2006 !
and I am not bullish about all property.
rofl. I have no doubt that those who still can't afford their own home will hang on to his every word and conveniently forget that the property doomsters like McWilliams got it manifestly
wrong in 1999
wrong in 2000
wrong in 2001
wrong in 2002
wrong in 2003
wrong in 2004
wrong in 2005
wrong in 2006 !
and I am not bullish about all property.
and I am not bullish about all property.
and I am not bullish about all property.
I disagree. I think that McWilliams was looking at it from an Ecomonics point of view. He was only proven wrong becasue cheap money was available and Irish people took advantage of all offerings from banks etc. This cheap credit facility is ending fast.
Ah yes, the ol' "Ive-smoked-100-cigs-a-day-still-no-cancer" logic. Hang on, maybe it even prevents cancer!?
I disagree. I think that McWilliams was looking at it from an Ecomonics point of view. He was only proven wrong becasue cheap money was available and Irish people took advantage of all offerings from banks etc. This cheap credit facility is ending fast.
That's good because an anonymous poll suggests that given the current downturn in the property market, 70% of people think that McWilliams is finally not going to be wrong! I expect he will be....
correct in 2007
correct in 2008
correct in 2009
correct in 2010
Excellent - can you ask him what the lotto numbers will be on Sat. night.
roflol what have I said that's incorrect?
[broken link removed]
Watch this place fall in value. Is 725K just being ambitious or is the vendor reading a different market ?
Ireland deserves a crash with lunatics like that, theres another home on the same estate at 550KThats a cool US$1million. It shows just how far we have come in a few years, alot done and more to do - US$ 2m by 2010.....
Still falling...Flippin' Stillorgan...
These just keep getting cheaper!
Developers Price €590,000:
[broken link removed]=
This one has been for sale for months now. Miju even made that controversial call about it, the price had been reduced from €575,000 to €560,000
http://www.daft.ie/searchsale.daft?search=1&selected_agent=&id=84285&s[agent_id]=218&s[p]=upsvvwrp
And the latest one (appeared today) is €550,000
[broken link removed]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?