G
The same thing is happening in Galway now .coinfused said:Hi 2pack, much closer than Mullingar- a hop skip and jump from west Dublin, thats what has surprised us- if you're curious i can pm you the area. all this has only happened since Monday- makes me very suspicious
2Pack said:be warned that prices in your Mullingars will fall more than the prices in your Maynooths.
2Pack said:The same thing is happening in Galway now .
This house wasas while it is now €485k
Thats a €35k drop in a very short time.
I take your word for 'very close' Coinfused. Not Bands 1 or 2 then
This guy shifted none of these properties between and 5th (today) and has not dropped his prices either.
here is the link [broken link removed]bearishbull said:Anyone hear the "today" show on rte radio1 today? they had a trinity economist and the head of the auctioneers and valuers on debating a "soft landing " or "crash" ,you can listen again on rte website.
If you are a Mullingarander I must apologise .CGorman said:I take issue with your dismissal of Mullingar as meerly a commuter town. Property prices here are'nt based solely on Dublin commuters - yes about 20% of householders could be classed as commuters - but that still leaves 80% working in the locality.
Taken straight out of the Chamber of Commerce handbook style , good man. Pitch noted with a warm glow . Mullingar is looking a lot better than it was 20 years ago when the FCA sentenced me there for 2 weeksIn recent years the town has been the second fastest growing in the country (after Letterkenny) and County Council forecasts expect the population to be 40,000 by 2010 (its about 33,000 presently). In addition the IDA are in the process of opening a major new business park and one of the largest retail developments outside Dublin is currently under construction in the town center. Not to mention, Mullingar has the highest percentage of "professionals" in the country. Oh - add in the decentralised Dept of Educaton. Mullingar has very strong underlying fudamentals that are'nt dependent solely on being a satellite town of Dublin. Also note that their has been a major shortage of supply of housing in the town in recent years; partly due to the lack of a new sewage scheme (until very recently).
I deliberately picked TOWNS and not VILLAGES in the OUTER Dublin Commuter belt between 40 and 50 miles. I feel villages have fewer estate agents to watch thru the Googlce CacheI know you just took Mullingar as an example - but perhaps a town more dependent on commuting such as Navan, Rochfortbridge, Ballivor or Kinnegad might have been a better choice.
ubiquitous said:In what way? I think you are missing the point that the PRTB are merely recording registrations of rented properties. Their figures make no reference to, or assessment of, the numbers of unregistered rented properties.
It is well-recognised (notably by the government itself) that the vast majority of landlords have failed to register with the PRTB. A special measure to force landlords to do so, on pain of losing tax relief on mortgage interest, was therefore included in the recent finance act.
On this basis, the following conclusions on your weblog are naive, to say the least. Hopefully the remainder of your blog is more rigorous...
its hard to judge on single instances like this, I think you would have to compare to other houses in the area. Maybe they were just chancing their arm and the going price for houses there was €450k?
You can only guess at what's going to happen.coinfused said:Now we don't know whether to take advantage of the wobble (the higher priced houses would previously have gone for 381-400, the lower one around 350) or hold off and see them drop further
Raskolnikov said:The next window for an interest rate hike is in August.
Duplex said:"IT WON'T HAPPEN HERE"
Duplex said:The PRTB are not, as you wrongly suggest, "merely recording registrations of rented properties"
At the end of 2005, the number of registrations with the PRTB was 83,983 and this was in respect of 53,070 landlords and 150,518 tenants. At 3 March 2006, the number of registrations with the PRTB was 88,593 and this was in respect of 55,685 landlords and 160,251 tenants.
Have you any evidence to back up this statement? Simply quoting (out of context) one particular set of statistics published by this body hardly proves your case. Especially when your blog includes such questionable statements as this example:The PRTB can hardly provide policy advice if they have sketchy or no data on the private rented sector. The government have created a body that has failed to fulfill its stated role.
So, as far as the government is concerned, out of an Irish population of 4,200,000, only 160,000 are private sector tenants
Duplex said:My point is that the PTRB are tasked with providing government with advice on policy formation with regard to the private sector. They (the PTRB) have thus far registered 160,000 odd tenants, this would seem to a conspicuously underestimate the true number of tenancies given the high participation rate in the rented sector by investors. I’m afraid I have no accurate figures as to the true size of the private sector, but neither do the government (my point). It may seem acceptable to you that our government formulates policy in a haze of ignorance, but I find this abysmal.
walk2dewater said:Wait a second, whats with all this hair splitting on data? Sure isnt data for the doom-mongers and begrudgers sitting around their bedsits? Arn't the bulls supposed to be saying that Irish property prices are going nowhere but up and buy now before you're priced out, rent-is-dead-money-enjoy-the-boom-soft-landing-boomed-for-15yrs-can't- fall-now-demographics-low-inflation-celtic-tiger-economics etc etc?
I'm a bit confused today with all this bearishness
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?