CelloPoint
Registered User
- Messages
- 75
More like 100k houses this year.in my honest opinion i believe that a soft landing is not possible
they are building 80,000plus houses a year and we already have dare i say it 275,000 houses "in the bank" empty
well I want blood
Well it might give the next shower of muppets that think about pulling something like this pause for thought, and it might give the current shower a new reality to deal with. Thats a distinct benefit I can come up with. Obviously calling for actual blood is silly, but strict regulation of the lending market with criminal penalties for infringement (including misleading marketing practices), as well as harsh laws to counteract corruption in goverment, would do wonders.Why? That's hardly helpful. Some of us actually like living here; I'd prefer to get on with life - because like it or not, it goes on - and deal with reality rather than looking for blood. You just - as it happens - have to get on with it and deal with reality. The world does not stop.
Why? That's hardly helpful. Some of us actually like living here; I'd prefer to get on with life - because like it or not, it goes on - and deal with reality rather than looking for blood. You just - as it happens - have to get on with it and deal with reality. The world does not stop.
Oh, and in case it's relevant I am a FTB currently "waiting". Am I happy that I had to wait? Nope, but hell, life goes on. It's not like I'm sitting at home with bitterness building up inside.
Does daylight bother you?
I'm taking garlic and bringing the holy water before I post here again!
Well it might give the next shower of muppets that think about pulling something like this pause for thought, and it might give the current shower a new reality to deal with. Thats a distinct benefit I can come up with. Obviously calling for actual blood is silly, but strict regulation of the lending market with criminal penalties for infringement (including misleading marketing practices), as well as harsh laws to counteract corruption in goverment, would do wonders.
Well it might give the next shower of muppets that think about pulling something like this pause for thought, and it might give the current shower a new reality to deal with. Thats a distinct benefit I can come up with. Obviously calling for actual blood is silly, but strict regulation of the lending market with criminal penalties for infringement (including misleading marketing practices), as well as harsh laws to counteract corruption in goverment, would do wonders.
as for the blood remark dont be so gutless
....and your posts cast no shadow
But does the effect of interest rates not negate this? i.e interest rates then were also above the inflation rate, so whilst their initial capital was less, they had to repay many multiples of what you repay on the same nominal amount.To make matters worse about signing up for a 35 year mortgage - inflation wont devalue the principal to the same extent that it did for our parents' generation.
I hear a lot of people say "It'll be tough enough for the first few years but by the end our repayments will be piffle in real terms." OK for our parents who borrowed, lets say 10,000 in 1973. By 1983 inflation of 10%+ had diminished the value of what they owed.
Our generation are looking at 35 year terms rather than 20/25 years and inflation of 4% rather than 15%.
People are basing their expectations of life on what their parents tell them, (to a certain degree), but it's going to be tougher.
Forget about early retirement etc with a long term mortgage, prepare for difficulty when your Mrs has babies and you miss her contributions toward the mortgage....
Lower your expectations......
Am very pessimistic - I wish it wasn't so...
Not if your borrowing 6 times your salary . Inflation often exceeded interest rates in 70s and 80s and wage inflation usually kept pace with both.But does the effect of interest rates not negate this? i.e interest rates then were also above the inflation rate, so whilst their initial capital was less, they had to repay many multiples of what you repay on the same nominal amount.
Not this again, who exactly is being denied a home?its a touchy subject afterall a home is a basic necessity
If only they'd taken account of this possibility in their 5 year plan, no matter, they should just seize these (dare i use such bad lannguage on AAM) 'investment' properties, and redistribute to those in need of owning their own homes.the government never tried to prevent investors outbidding FTBs
what has happened is a disgrace seriously there is anger among some people
it shouldnt be allowed to happen in future
the government never tried to prevent investors outbidding FTBs
Im not suggesting people are living on the streets but since the country has supposedly never been better off then whats with all the people commuting from so far away with a crappy quality of lifeNot this again, who exactly is being denied a home?
But wage inflation is currently in excess of both inflation and interest rates too, and inflation has been below interest rates for the past 3/4 years. So what is the difference?Not if your borrowing 6 times your salary . Inflation often exceeded interest rates in 70s and 80s and wage inflation usually kept pace with both.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?