It them item is €3500 then the €100 is only covering the cost of him taking the card payment.... he isn't making a profit out of it...
2.5% would be the maximum that he would be charged. That would work out at €87.50 in your case based on €3500.
His charge seems fair as it is not excessive. I do agree he would have mentioned it from the outset.
I phoned the government's consumer helpline who informed me that, because the retailer had changed the contract by imposing a credit card surcharge, i was legally entitled to reject the contract entirely (i.e. not proceed with the purchase). The consumer people told me the retailer must return my deposit if i rejected the new contract.
I agree with you and would be backing out on principle also. But sorry no experience with it. Have you tried quoting what the consumer helpline said? If that doesn't work - get back on to them and ask them how to get your deposit back?
Payment by credit card is not always accepted. that is the retailers right. He accepted the deposit via CC without charging any surcharge. What if he told you that he was unable to take CC payments any more ? You should be thankful that he absorbed the surcharge for the deposit.
True - but OP had asked was credit card accepted? HE was told yes and a price was agreed in full knowledge that his credit card would be used. This was added on afterwards! Why should the OP be "thankful" that the retailer went back to the original price - while being rude at the same time.
IF the retailer had mentioned it at the time, the OP would have had a choice.
If the retailer didn't want to take credit cards, just say no at the start - it's very simple, OR inform the customer at the start.
Thanks Dem, I did quote what they said to no avail. I'll give them a ring back as you suggested.
This seems to be a huge over-reaction to me.
You ordered a custom-made piece at a cost of 3500.
After waiting for the item to be made, the retailer tells you that you will have to pay a small surcharge amounting to less than 3%.
Payment by credit card is not always accepted. that is the retailers right. He accepted the deposit via CC without charging any surcharge. What if he told you that he was unable to take CC payments any more ? You should be thankful that he absorbed the surcharge for the deposit.
I think that you are the one breaking the contract here, as you commissioned him to make the item and are now not paying for it as the retailer won't take Visa. He is under no obligation to accept payment via CC as it's not 'legal tender'.
I think that you looking for the deposit back after he spends a good deal of time and effort doing something you commissioned, to be a little rich on your part. If I were him, I'd be chasing you for the time wasted on a piece worth far less to someone who didn't commission it.
If i just wasted my time and money making something for someone to leave me in the lurch over less than 3%, I can imagine I may be rude too.
The OP still has a choice, pay the surcharge, or pay by draft.
Bob Hopes - Why not pay by Draft and get what you commissioned ?
Fair enough, but why cancel the deal then ? Just go another day...I was not in a position to make it to the bank and queue for a draft on the day in question.
To me it seems like nit-picking. If you really wanted this 3.5k one-off item, then you'd pay for it (by CC or draft). If you don't want it, then you lose your deposit and I think he's got every right to chase you for the rest of the payment as a one-off is only worth the price to the person who commissioned it. It's most likely not worth 3.5k to anyone else, therefore the retailer is losing out. He should by rights get that difference from you.
Obviously it's not that important to you. What was the item in question ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?