None-according to today's Sunday Times.
From what I have read, it would appear that the Pensions Board aren't really behind the introduction of compulsory pensions.
The Pensions Board is never going to reach a consensus on this one.
But that simply reflects the nature of the Board - it's composed of representatives from ICTU, IBEC, insurance companies, Dept Finance, Dept of Social and Family Affairs etc. You're never going to get that lot to agree on anything related to pensions policy - there are far too many conflicting vested interests.
The Board were asked by Brennan to prepare a report for him on how a mandatory system might work. If they hadn't been asked to do this by Brennan they never would have touched this subject in a fit.
The Dept of Finance has done it's best to strangle Brennan's idea at birth, but ICTU have come out and told Finance to back off. (ICTU have recently come around to supporting the idea of mandatory pensions).
No specific scheme is being proposed at the moment - the Pension Board's report is more of a general consideration of the issues involved, with some examples based on notional schemes.
But this debate doesn't look like it's going to quietly disappear (despite Finance's best efforts to rubbish it). The government has committed to a green paper on pensions policy as part of Towards 2016 and with ICTU throwing their weight behind the mandatory option, it's going to get interesting...