My friends have contacted the CRO over this and the reply from the CRO has been that there is no law against people registering business names that are already in use.
business name and company names are differentI find this very strange. When I was setting up my own Limited Company, 5 years ago, I wasn't permitted to use the business name I'd originally intended as another company, which had been liquidated a number of years previously, had been registered in that name.
Your friends response from the CRO is inconsistent with what I'd been told. Maybe things have changed but I find it hard to believe that two companies would be allowed to register under the same name - IMO, there is too much risk of commercial confusion, particularly when they're trading in the same locality.
As other posters have recommended, your friends should contact a solicitor.
....Recently, a competitor who operates nearby registered "ABCDE Services" as a business name in his own name/address. This competitor has done this with mallicious intent. While his own business continues under its original name etc., he has sent letters and circulated documentation under the name "ABCDE Services" which has caused confusion among potential customers and lost business for the genuine "ABCDE Services"....?
Having recently been threatened with an injunction (I hasten to add I believe completely in the wrong and the persons who threatened it did not proceed as they obviously felt the same deep down!) I would point out that you may have the strongest case in the world and may indeed have costs awarded against the defendant....but you are responsible for paying your own legal team and then you must persue the defendant for these costs like any other debt (and there are numerous threads showing how difficult it is to get money out of people). You don't walk away from court owing nothing. Injunctions are horrendously risky and expensive and your solicitor won't send that threatening letter unless he's sure you are prepared to lose 10 grand+ should it all go pear shaped in court. In the case of a small company it is likely the law will be a waste of space as it often is. It'll make the barristers a good few pound of course but better to take a different route for long term sanity!You should ask you solicitor about getting an injunction to stop them. If your case is good, they will have to pay your costs as well.
Having recently been threatened with an injunction (I hasten to add I believe completely in the wrong and the persons who threatened it did not proceed as they obviously felt the same deep down!) I would point out that you may have the strongest case in the world and may indeed have costs awarded against the defendant....but you are responsible for paying your own legal team and then you must persue the defendant for these costs like any other debt (and there are numerous threads showing how difficult it is to get money out of people). You don't walk away from court owing nothing. Injunctions are horrendously risky and expensive and your solicitor won't send that threatening letter unless he's sure you are prepared to lose 10 grand+ should it all go pear shaped in court. In the case of a small company it is likely the law will be a waste of space as it often is. It'll make the barristers a good few pound of course but better to take a different route for long term sanity!
What was in the letter and documentation that would lose business?
Could you contact all suppliers, informing of the above and how to determine a real order from the geniune company. Also a advertising campaign to inform customers and potential customers of how to identify the geniune company also. By address for example or company identity, logo/branding etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?