C
crugers
Guest
I'm trying to work backwards to prove figures given for options @ early retirement.
Available Pension:€39.6k p.a.
or
Commutation Lump Sum€127.6k, +
Reduced Pension::€32.8k p.a.
Each €1 commuted = €18.844 TFLS
Pensionable Salary: €88,920.33
DoE: 01/05/1972
DoR: 30/04/2004
I'm told Commutation Lump Sum is calculated thus:
Years of Service
Oct 1977 - DoE = 5.42yr
Oct 1977 to DoR =26.58yr
(a) (5.42/15) X (20/75) X 25% X €88.9k(Pensionable Salary) X 18.844 = €40.3k
(b) 26.58yr X (3/80) X €88.9k = €88.5k
(a) + (b) should= Commutation Lump Sum of €127.6
My questions are:
What is significance of Oct 1977?
Why multiplier in (a) of 20/75?
Why multiply this by 25%?
Why multiplier in (b) of 3/80?
Sum doesn't add up, so I'm going back to understand where problem is.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Available Pension:€39.6k p.a.
or
Commutation Lump Sum€127.6k, +
Reduced Pension::€32.8k p.a.
Each €1 commuted = €18.844 TFLS
Pensionable Salary: €88,920.33
DoE: 01/05/1972
DoR: 30/04/2004
I'm told Commutation Lump Sum is calculated thus:
Years of Service
Oct 1977 - DoE = 5.42yr
Oct 1977 to DoR =26.58yr
(a) (5.42/15) X (20/75) X 25% X €88.9k(Pensionable Salary) X 18.844 = €40.3k
(b) 26.58yr X (3/80) X €88.9k = €88.5k
(a) + (b) should= Commutation Lump Sum of €127.6
My questions are:
What is significance of Oct 1977?
Why multiplier in (a) of 20/75?
Why multiply this by 25%?
Why multiplier in (b) of 3/80?
Sum doesn't add up, so I'm going back to understand where problem is.
Any insight would be appreciated.