IMF,
Do not put me up as an expert in the giving of legal advice - I most definitely am not.
I am giving you common sense advice based on my laypersons view of several court cases I have attended
I was trained as an architect, and I've offered sworn declarations, signed reports and expert witness testimony to the courts.
However I am not formally legally trained and I couldn't hold a candle to a good solicitor or barrister.
In the preparation, a barrister might hold back on matters of sworn evidence to bring up issues raised in research on cross examination.
That's why I and others here are advising you to take legal advice.
It seems clear to me that, knowing you to be a layperson, they are tempting you into making basic mistakes.
Somethign is afoot, or else they would not be answering you in this fashion.
To give the opposite argument - it could be a ploy by them to hold matters back in the document exchanges that they may ambush you with in court.
This could well backfire on them if a judge takes a dim view.
ONQ.