Chartered Tax Advisor or Graduate Diploma in Financial Services

leroy67

Registered User
Messages
194
For someone looking to build a career int financial services which would be the better option.

Would like to work in an advisory role however hugely interested in the taxation side.

As cost of both is similar circa 6k can afford to do one only,

Pros and Con's?
 
Hi Leroy,

I just read your pension question and see that you are also taking your QFA.

Here are some pointers based on my experience.

When I employ a tax consultant I look for a couple of things including qualifications and "bedside manner" but significantly I also look for experience gained in an established practice working with other experienced tax consultants.

My view would be that in order to be successful in tax advice you need around 10 years post qualification experience. Otherwise you run the risk of just completing tax returns and doing capital gains tax calculations for ever.

However, some of the best financial planners I know are not "traditional" financial advisers or bankers. In fact financial planning has very little to do with traditional financial services at all when it is done properly. People dont make financial decisions, they make life decisions that have financial implications. Good planners focus on their clients, not products or the direction of markets.

A good financial planner is more like an architect than a traditional product salesperson and in my view traditional financial services experience can actually be a handicap.

I speak to advisers every day about the "new model" for financial planning and a very high proportion of them either don't get it, or don't believe it .

Yet, next year the UK, India, Australia and Holland are all moving to ban commission payments to a greater or lesser extent for investment products.

Financial Planning is becoming a Profession around the world and if you want to help people to make smart decisions with their money, then I'd have a look at financial planning as a career. If you want to have a chat, feel free to give me a call.
 
For someone looking to build a career int financial services which would be the better option.

Would like to work in an advisory role however hugely interested in the taxation side.

As cost of both is similar circa 6k can afford to do one only,

Pros and Con's?

How about this course, Diploma in Principles of Financial Services Taxation

[broken link removed]
 
Thanks for the input.

God no I don't wish to be a banker with all due respect to them.

I am (ahem of mature years) so want to firstly complete QFA's register with central Bank and set up my own brokerage concentrating on life,pensions and investments.

The question around which exam to take was based on what other areas of expertise I could bring to this.

Marc thank you I think you have answered my question, do the Graduate Diploma in Financial Services and once I have three years experience complete the CFP.
 
I thin the graduate diploma in financial services is a bit overpriced for a rather generic course - I have heard that there was an intention to "bolt on" two or three extra modules and give the course Masters status. Personally I think this is a much better option, I think a Masters will add value beyond the extra 6 months and 1500 - 2000.

Depending on what other qualifications you already have, I think you might be better to look at the Institutes Professional Certificates. I think they give better value for money.
 
Back
Top