Steven Barrett
Registered User
- Messages
- 5,331
It is in the year of assessment. If a company director (it is almost always company directors) want to make large pension contributions, it should be before 31 December 2024.Hi Steven,
In this case, would the Salary amount be calculated per the calendar year or per the companies financial year? i.e. if calendar year, should there be a rush to get money into PRSA before the end of 2024?
It appears so.It’s emoluments, isn’t it? So salary, bonus, the works?
Thanks for the update.From 1 January 2025, the cap on employer paid PRSA contributions is capped at 100% salary. Any payments over this amount is treated as BIK.
The unlimited contribution rule lasted just 2 years but greed took over for a small number of people (both advisors and their clients) who pushed things by giving family members nominal salaries and massive pension contributions. The salary related cap is a clear signal that this is the reason for the cap.
The people this will hit most is company directors who have reduced their salaries after debts are paid off and families raised. Now they want to concentrate on pension funding. In many cases, these directors are behind in pension funding as they spent years growing their business.
I had thought they would adopt the same funding checks that are in place for master trusts. It will now be a case by case basis on whether a PRSA or a Master Trust is the best vehicle for someone's pension.
At least all these complications will keep me in a job for a bit longer!!
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
I would expect though, if one was at a limit, e.g. where 150,000 was available for Salary & Pension, the employer could contribute 75K to the Pension, and then the employee could choose to contribute a portion of their 75K as an employee contribution, albeit subject to USC & PRSI.It’s emoluments, isn’t it? So salary, bonus, the works?
I think it’s fair to say that it ignores the reality for many business owners. Which is to invest in the business in the early years and to then think about retirement planning later on.
There should be no restrictions other than the SFT. It’s a cap in itself.
If someone wants to put €1m in, fine. There’s an overarching constraint.
Agreed LD, big difference from someone late to the pension game and catching up vs someone taking the proverbial.
We have age-related limits on employee contributions, would have liked to see something similar introduced instead of the blanket 100%.
But arguably someone should also be allowed to ‘salary sacrifice’ a bonus into their pension.
Yes to 1, no to 2…I understand the logic behind the salary sacrifice rules, even if I don't agree with them existing at all. If someone has the ability to direct their employer to put a sum of money either into their pension or into their salary, then in effect it's not really an "employer contribution" but can more accurately be described as an employee contribution, as the employee decided how to use the money available to them. So the rules around employee contribution apply.
That said, at a higher level, I think that the whole distinction between employer and employee contributions should be scrapped anyway. How's this for simplification: -
- Apply the existing "salary and service" rules to ALL pension contributions, regardless of whether they're coming from employer, employee, AVCs and also to Personal Pensions, PRSAs for the self-employed sole traders and partners. Same rules for everyone, regardless of the form of their employment. Scrap the age-related tax relief limits.
- SFT of €2 million (soon to be increased) remains.
Yes to 1, no to 2…
Leaving it at €2m.What do you not like about the SFT?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?