Yes, It seems to be one of the main conditions. Shouldn't pose me any problems.You seem well aware that one of the main conditions of claiming job-seekers benefit is that you must be actively seeking work.
I'm not the looking for agreement type, I happy enough to make my own decisions. I'm looking for information, if i wanted judgment, I'd go to confession.Really what you're looking for here is someone to condone you breaking the law.
I'm not concerned with the legality TBH. I'm comfortable with it. It would take me 5-7 years to save enough enough money to live off my own savings for 2 years. I'm not wasting that many years in a career i feel no affection for. It would be a waste of life. I'd rather be a bold boy now and spend the next couple of years studying so in 5-7 years, I'll be in a career that i really love.It's not just morally wrong; it's legally wrong and if you can't afford to take a career break without financial support then you shouldn't take it at all IMHO.
Firstly, you are taking a career break to free yourself up to sudy; therefore youa re not available for full-time work. Secondly, you will not be considered to be unemployed by SW and therefore won't qualify for JB.
The study is home study so I'll qualify for that.
What reasons would I not be considered unemployed by SW? The terms of the career break allow me to take up employment with others and I'm certainly not employed during working hours during it as i'd be at home.
I of course would not be telling SW that i took the break to study.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?