ubiquitous said:The area of land must have been extremely small if he only got 10k for it. Its unlikely that he will have much of a CGT liability once the proceeds are this low as presumably the land had some value when he purchased it. This value should attract indexation relief and the first €1270 of your dad's gain will be exempt from CGT (this is doubled if the land was jointly owned).
ClubMan said:Have you checked the [broken link removed]? Also, where no special (e.g. agricultural land) exemptions or reliefs apply Ishmael Whale's CGT calculator might be useful.
Your dad's CGT position will depend on the circumstances of his own situation as much as on the CGT rules that apply to him. This is because most aspects of the rules of CGT are subject to terms and conditions. Because some of these terms and conditions are relatively complicated (for example those relating to Retirement Relief as mentioned by Vanilla), in most cases it would be impossible for you or anyone else to properly verify the position simply in the basis of what you might find in revenue.ie or in other publications.I checked revenue guides but not so clear. The Solictor told him that there was not CGT liability, but i am being paranoid and id like to see it on revenue documenation that there is not!. Dont want to see him up on some tax avoidance list in the independent!!!
taxadvisor said:A brief answer.
If he acquired the land on or before 06/04/74 and it was worth 1497 EUROS or less at that time no Capital Gains arises if sold in 2004 or after for €10,000. As someone already mentioned you could also deduct legal costs and enhancement expenditure. This would help if the land was valued at less than 1497 EUROS.
If he acquired the land on or before 06/04/74 and it was worth 1497 EUROS or less at that time no Capital Gains arises if sold in 2004 or after for €10,000.
If he acquired the land on or before 06/04/74 and it was worth 1497 EUROS or less at that time no Capital Gains arises if sold in 2004 or after for €10,000. As someone already mentioned you could also deduct legal costs and enhancement expenditure. This would help if the land was valued at less than 1497 EUROS
ubiquitous said:This is clearly incorrect and should presumably read 1497 euros or more - a valuation that would be hard to justify for poor, boggy land in 1974. Note that any element of value (at the date of acquisition) arising from potential development is ineligible for indexation.
Tomas,
As I said above, you are in all probability wasting your time trying to second-guess your solicitor's advice and you or your dad really need to have him explain his reasoning if you have any reason to doubt him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?