My brother built a house and got a local man to plumb it instead of the main contractor. A year later and they have had numerous problems with leaks and it appears that the piping was faulty to begin with. He has contacted his insurnace company to see if they will payout to have the house replumbed but they are saying it is not their problem. Is this the case? Is there any other way he can claim money towards this without suing the initial plumber? Thank you.
I can't see this being grounds for an insurance claim. The house insurance would cover replacement of damaged items but would never cover faulty items like plumbing, pipes, leaky rads etc (trust me... I know!). They are always at your own cost. I would recommend pursuing the contractor for damages & perhaps involve your solicitor.
My brother built a house and got a local man to plumb it instead of the main contractor. A year later and they have had numerous problems with leaks and it appears that the piping was faulty to begin with. He has contacted his insurnace company to see if they will payout to have the house replumbed but they are saying it is not their problem. Is this the case? Is there any other way he can claim money towards this without suing the initial plumber? Thank you.
My brother built a house and got a local man to plumb it instead of the main contractor. A year later and they have had numerous problems with leaks and it appears that the piping was faulty to begin with. He has contacted his insurnace company to see if they will payout to have the house replumbed but they are saying it is not their problem. Is this the case? Is there any other way he can claim money towards this without suing the initial plumber? Thank you.