You would be better off being on joint/aggregated married taxation for any year in which one of you was on the high rate of tax and the other was on the low rate. Note that you can only backdate claims by 4 years max.I have been taxed seperately to my husband for years, last year i left work for a while and earned in total 17,000 in 2006.
You mean 42% (2006) and 41% (2007) I presume as the high rate has not been at 43% for a long time (if it ever was?).I thought i could transfer some of my tax allowance to my husband, be taxed as a couple and he would get a refund on some of the amount he paid 43% on by using the balance of what i didn't use at 20%.
I don't think so. I think that you should be able to backdate opting for joint/aggregated married taxation but maybe you can't.He rang the tax office and was told he was too late. Can this really be the case?
Just shows that even couples who are normally both in the top rate bracket might be better off in certain cases by opting for joint/aggregated married taxation or single married assessment but balancing things are year end. I still don't understand why couples would ever be better off opting for assessment as two single people.i wasn't to know how much i earned until end of dec., have to ring back but was hoping someone could enlighten me first.
He rang the tax office and was told he was too late. Can this really be the case?
I don't think so. I think that you should be able to backdate opting for joint/aggregated married taxation but maybe you can't.
Probably not but also possibly still worth opting for joint/aggregated married assessment or separate married assessment instead of assessment as two single individuals in case your circumstances change in the future (e.g. like last year). See [broken link removed]. If you want to opt for joint/aggregated or separate married assessment then (as above) you need to do it soon.We are now both earning at the top rate , so is there any other advantage of being taxed as a couple?
I have been taxed seperately to my husband for years, last year i left work for a while and earned in total 17,000 in 2006.
I thought i could transfer some of my tax allowance to my husband, be taxed as a couple and he would get a refund on some of the amount he paid 43% on by using the balance of what i didn't use at 20%.
He rang the tax office and was told he was too late. Can this really be the case? i wasn't to know how much i earned until end of dec., have to ring back but was hoping someone could enlighten me first.
Thanks.
But you must have registered as married based on the first sentence above in which you seem to describe registering for joint/aggregated married taxation.When I was pregnant we weren't sure how we'd deal with tax credits so we just printed out the form, filled it in, set hub as the assessable spouse but split credits 50 50 so we were still getting the same paycheque each month.
If I hadn't returned it would have been a different story and that's when being registered as married comes in to play.
I don't understand this. If you were on joint/aggregated married taxation then you should have automatically received the most beneficial tax treatment. If not or you were actually on separate married assessment then you should just ask for a P21 balancing statement for the relevant tax year to balance things up and get a refund of any taxes over paid. Where a married couple stay on single/individual assessment then they could end up worse off.Now I have to see what credits I used last year in the 6 months I was working and see if there is anything that I could have transferred.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?