My partner and I are interested in buying a beautiful site in Sligo.The site does have planning permission for a small dormer bungalow with no occupancy clause.
Our problem is that it is not the house we want to build.We are happy to stick to a bungalow,but something more contemporary and slightly bigger.We know that obviously we will have to submit planning permission,but we are very confused as to what we do and in what order.
The Estate Agent says we have to buy the site first,then see an Architect/Engineer about the design we want and finally submit the plans to the council to seek approval.However this worries me as I'm afraid if the council reject our plans,we are then stuck with a site which we cannot build on.But on the other hand,if we were to do it the opposite way round and submit plans before buying the site, is it worth paying to have a house designed for a site which is not yet ours?
If there is anyone with any knowledge as to A.the likelihood of us getting permission and B.in what order do we proceed from here, we would be very grateful for any tips or advice.It is also worth nothing that the current planning permission expires in August!
Thank you very much in advance!
+1 what threebedsemi and Brendan have posted, but the simple fact is that you've left this very late for an extended planning strategy ending with a hopefully successful appeal.
My experience of the nearby Donegal planning process is that a lot can rest for the success or otherwise on you having a connection to the area and the detail of the development plan.
It can also drag on for an extended period.
The alternative solutions seem to be; -
- offer a deposit and enter a contract to purchase subject to permission.
- risk the purchase and seek a change of house type.
Its clear that no route is a certainty, and this is why I say be very wary of people acting for the Vendor.
I note that its a buyer's market out there, with land and house prices continuing to fall, so perhaps consider this -
Turn the situation to your advantage by waiting until the planning expires, offer a deposit and get consent to seek permission.
You would still have to fund a full application but here you'd be paying for something you'd want and were tied into with a deposit.
If not, the term "no occupancy clause" is something an estate agent of solicitor might use - take no comfort from advice from such persons.
They usually act for the Vendor and they offer "advice" which can hardly be said to be independent or professional - they just want the sale!
You need to have the site, the permitted design, the permission wording and the history of the permission process competently and independently assessed.
Then you need to take professional advice in relation to both the permission and the likelihood of getting a revised permission by an architect or planning consultant.
ONQ.
[broken link removed]
All advice on AAM is remote from the situation and cannot be relied upon as a defence or support - in and of itself - should legal action be taken.
Competent legal and building professionals should be asked to advise in Real Life with rights to inspect and issue reports on the matters at hand.