podgerodge
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,061
You could perhaps write to Bunq and say "I am a Bunq depositor. I want a deposit rate as if I was a Dutch resident." Bunq would then write back and say "no" and perhaps then Kifid might entertain your complaint, but I suspect not.o dissatisfaction follows from your complaint which specificallyarose from your purchased financial service from Bunq B.V..
This is not at all true.It's difficult to open a bank account or get a mortgage in another EU country just as banks can't directly trade with customers accross the EU without involvement of local regulators.
It really is that simple! A Dutch online bank in Ireland is doing nothing more than running a website. All the back end is done outside Ireland.They can passport into Ireland but it's not as simple as for most other sectors.
Just wanted to say amazing work, big fan, and it proved it works@Freelance @Lightning and others
I received a communication from Kifid, stating they had a response from Bunq changing the text on their website. For reference, the original text was:
“We strive to offer our users the most competitive interest in all countries. Each country has its own set of rules and regulations (for example regarding taxes), resulting in different interest rates across Europe. As a bank we need to comply with those rules, which is why we maintain different interest rates in the Netherlands, Germany, France and other countries.”
Their response to Kifid states:
"I report on behalf of bunq that the web page about the interest rates has been adjusted: https://together.bunq.com/d/57157-update-to-massinterest-as-of-july-15-2023 . The website now displays the following text:
"We strive to offer our users a competitive interest in all countries where we operate. Each country however has its own set of rules, regulations and market conditions which result in different interest rates across Europe. The country where you are resident determines which of bunq's rates applies to you."
They follow on in their response to Kifid with:
"In view of the content of the complaint from Mr. XXX, the above change to the website, increasing the interest rate for Irish users and the requirement of a reasonable interest according to art. 3:303 BW, I request you to inform whether Mr. XXX wants to withdraw its complaint or Kifid can otherwise close the file.
If Kifid still wants to make a ruling, I request that you grant bunq a postponement for submitting a rejoinder until at least January 10, 2024, given my absence from Christmas until January 8, 2024."
FYI "Article 3:303 BW" is an article from the Dutch Civil Code meaning, according to Kifid when I asked, that you must have sufficient interest in your legal claim.
I feel like I am getting somewhere. It's a small piece of dubious language being used by Bunq, but at least they are finally making text changes. Interesting to see that they are now using their Irish interest rate increases as one of the excuses for me to withdraw the complaint.
I've responded to Kifid stating that the new text, which now includes "market conditions", and while it removes the 'which we need to comply with' piece, still clearly suggests things about rules and regulations and needs to be removed. Kifid have now gone back to Bunq.
@Lightning see above previous thing I posted, unfortunately it looks like they can discriminate on this particular issue. So I think I'm stuck with getting them to change language blaming factors other than their own decisions.Found the relevant piece I was talking about (this does not get Bunq off the hook for potentially telling porkies about WHY they are discriminating. They might be better off just saying "cos we want to", rather than blaming EU countries' law.
Article 15 of the Payment Account Directive[1] obliges Member States to ensure that credit institutions do not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the Union by reason of their nationality or place of residence. This rule, however, only applies as regards payment accounts, but not for instance, as regards savings accounts.
Furthermore, it is settled case law[2] that while citizens can invoke the breach of fundamental freedoms, the Commission can only act against State measures in its role as guardian of the Treaty. In this particular case, the Commission understands that the residence requirement for opening of savings accounts is a practice of some of the payment service providers but there is no national measure adopted by the concerned Member States (in the current case in Belgium or in Germany) imposing that requirement.
The Commission does not have information on different interest rates offered by credit institutions to residents of different Member States for similar deposits. Interest rates may differ per country based on supply and demand. As such, it is considered part of the commercial freedom of banks to determine what rate to offer.
The Commission does not currently consider any legislative changes to the Payment Accounts Directive in this respect.
@Lightning see above previous thing I posted, unfortunately it looks like they can discriminate on this particular issue. So I think I'm stuck with getting them to change language blaming factors other than their own decisions.
It really is that simple! A Dutch online bank in Ireland is doing nothing more than running a website. All the back end is done outside Ireland.
For example it's 10 times easier for Bunq to raise deposits in Ireland than it is for VW to sell cars in Ireland. The latter is impossible without a legal and physical presence, and pretty detailed knowledge of Irish tax and licensing regime.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?