Do builders bonds, the money they pay to the council/corporations not cover the finishing costs of an estate should the builder go bust?
Also do the local councils check that the estate is actually finished before releasing the bond?
This article in today's Irish Independent sheds some light on this issue - http://www.independent.ie/national-...-living-nightmare-for-homeowners-1937681.html
Do builders bonds, the money they pay to the council/corporations not cover the finishing costs of an estate should the builder go bust?
Also do the local councils check that the estate is actually finished before releasing the bond?
You are correct to the extent that this is what normally happens. But since the 2000 Planning Act, houseowners have the right to insist upon an estate being taken in charge and a legal remedy if the local authority fails or refuses to do so.
Houseowners in Ireland are slow at taking concerted action and communal decisions - but the development cited in the Indo was only eight houses; I am sure that they will be able to sort things out once they take proper advice instead of speaking to journalists.
I am having an issue with my local authority at the moment.. Bear with me and hear me out. The lights in our estate are not working, I am led to believe at some point they did. There is serious anti social behaviour going on as its a hangout for louts due to poor lighting. Developer has gone to ground. Council have his bond in place, council telling me really they aren't obliged to do anything. So per the above mentioned plannig act of 200 can someone advise on how to approach the council again, eg put words in my mouth.
Hi Onq,
I was in a huge rush earlier when typing so just in response to some of the things you said, we have a residents committee and we keep the place generally well kept and tidy. In the last few weeks asbos have been placed on 3 young lads and we seem to have been given some bit of a reprieve. But the fact remains that the public lighting is not working and the council is refusing to play ball with us (the residents committe) and developer is not an option. So what I can't understand is why even get a bond from developers if the councils won't use it. If anyone knows anymore about planning act of 2000 please come back to me if we have any remedy there..
If what I have posted is correct then nobody should sign a contract to purchase a house in an unbuilt estate. Seems pretty clear to me.
I am currently living in an estate with unfinsihed roads and other various problems. The company who built the estate has been disolved,
We managed to meet with a county councillor this evening. He stated that the council are owed money by the developer. That no bond was in place. And as it stands they will not be taking over roads, etc.
After leaving the meeting a few things a niggling at me.
1) If no bond was in place should the council of allowed our houses to be built in the first place?
2) If the developer is now bust and the council unwilling to take over. Who at the moment is paying the ESB for the street lighting? Obviously nobody. Would the ESB cut them off?
The residents plan to meet again next week. We have agreed to contact our solicitors to check exactly what our purchase price included. If it states "x" amount for the completion of road etc, should we then approach the companies liqidators and stake our claim as creditors?
Any help with any of the above would be much appreciated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?