Just missed this yesterday but from a comment that was read out I gather than he dispelled some of the panic re the urgent need for pensions.
I would have thought that the so-called "timebomb" was a real issue that was somewhat compensated for by government provision in recent years for future public pensions, but that everyone should still be encouraged to make provision.
What was the general thrust of Brendan's interview??
I would have thought that the so-called "timebomb" was a real issue that was somewhat compensated for by government provision in recent years for future public pensions, but that everyone should still be encouraged to make provision.
What was the general thrust of Brendan's interview??